Variable Flow System Design for HVAC Engineers
Variable Flow System Design for HVAC Engineers
Variable flow systems modulate airflow or water flow to match actual loads, reducing fan and pump energy by 30-60% compared to constant-volume systems. Proper design requires understanding minimum flow limits, diversity factors, and control strategies.
Fan Energy Savings
Fan affinity laws:
$$\frac{CFM_2}{CFM_1} = \frac{RPM_2}{RPM_1}$$
$$\frac{Power_2}{Power_1} = \left(\frac{RPM_2}{RPM_1}\right)^3$$
At 50% airflow:
$$Power_{50%} = 0.5^3 = 0.125 = 12.5%$$ of full power
Energy savings: 87.5% reduction at half flow
Worked Example 1: VAV Energy Savings
Given:
- Design airflow: 20,000 CFM
- Full-load fan power: 15 hp
- Average operating airflow: 60% of design
- Operating hours: 4,000 hours/year
- Electricity cost: $0.12/kWh
Find: Annual energy savings vs. constant volume
Solution:
Variable speed power at 60% flow:
$$Power_{60%} = 15 \times 0.6^3 = 15 \times 0.216 = 3.24 \text{ hp}$$
Energy savings per hour:
$$\Delta E = (15 - 3.24) \times 0.746 = 8.76 \text{ kW}$$
Annual savings:
$$Savings = 8.76 \times 4000 \times 0.12 = $4,205$$
Answer: $4,205/year energy savings (76% reduction)
VAV System Design
Minimum Airflow
Reasons for minimum flow:
- Meet ventilation requirements (ASHRAE 62.1)
- Maintain air circulation
- Prevent stratification
- Ensure diffuser performance
Typical minimum: 30-50% of design airflow
Calculation:
$$CFM_{min} = \max\left(CFM_{ventilation}, 0.3 \times CFM_{design}\right)$$
Diversity Factor
Not all zones at peak load simultaneously
System diversity:
$$Diversity = \frac{\sum CFM_{design,zones}}{CFM_{AHU,actual}}$$
Typical values:
- Office buildings: 1.2-1.4
- Schools: 1.1-1.3
- Hospitals: 1.0-1.1 (less diversity)
Impact: Allows smaller AHU and ductwork sizing
Static Pressure Control
Setpoint location: 2/3 distance from fan to furthest terminal
Control strategy:
$$SP_{setpoint} = SP_{design} \times \left(\frac{CFM_{actual}}{CFM_{design}}\right)^2$$
Static pressure reset:
- Monitors all VAV damper positions
- If all dampers < 90% open, reduce static pressure setpoint
- Saves fan energy without sacrificing control
graph TD
A[Measure all VAV damper positions] --> B{Any damper > 90% open?}
B -->|Yes| C[Increase SP setpoint by 0.1 \"w.g.]
B -->|No| D{All dampers < 50% open?}
D -->|Yes| E[Decrease SP setpoint by 0.1 \"w.g.]
D -->|No| F[Maintain current SP setpoint]
C --> G[Limit: SP_min to SP_max]
E --> G
F --> G
G --> H[Modulate fan speed to maintain SP]
Pressure-Independent VAV Terminals
Advantages:
- Maintains design airflow regardless of duct pressure variations
- Simplified balancing
- Better control stability
Components:
- Airflow sensor (pressure grid or hot-wire anemometer)
- Controller with airflow setpoint
- Modulating damper with actuator
Control:
$$Damper% = f\left(CFM_{setpoint} - CFM_{measured}\right)$$
Variable Primary Flow Chilled Water
Replaces constant primary / variable secondary with single variable loop
Benefits:
- Eliminates primary pumps
- Reduces piping complexity
- Lower first cost and energy
Requirements:
- Minimum flow through chillers: Use bypass valve or 3-way valve
- Chiller isolation: Two-way valves at each chiller
- Differential pressure control: Maintain 15-20 psi across system
Minimum flow calculation:
$$GPM_{min,chiller} = 2-3 \text{ ft/s} \times A_{evaporator}$$
Typically 30-50% of design flow
Pump Energy Savings
Pump affinity laws:
$$\frac{GPM_2}{GPM_1} = \frac{RPM_2}{RPM_1}$$
$$\frac{Head_2}{Head_1} = \left(\frac{RPM_2}{RPM_1}\right)^2$$
$$\frac{Power_2}{Power_1} = \left(\frac{RPM_2}{RPM_1}\right)^3$$
Variable vs. constant speed:
Worked Example 2: Pump Energy at Part Load
Given:
- Design flow: 500 GPM at 60 ft head
- Part-load flow: 250 GPM (50%)
- Pump efficiency: 75%
Find: Power savings with VFD vs. throttling valve
Solution:
Constant speed with throttle valve:
Power unchanged (still pumping against 60 ft head)
$$Power_{constant} = \frac{500 \times 60}{3960 \times 0.75} = 10.1 \text{ hp}$$
Variable speed:
Speed ratio: 50%
Head at 50% flow:
$$Head_{50%} = 60 \times 0.5^2 = 15 \text{ ft}$$
$$Power_{variable} = \frac{250 \times 15}{3960 \times 0.75} = 1.26 \text{ hp}$$
Savings: $(10.1 - 1.26) / 10.1 = 87.5%$
Answer: 87.5% energy savings with VFD at 50% flow
VFD Sizing and Selection
VFD must match motor:
- Voltage (230V, 460V, etc.)
- Current (nameplate FLA)
- Horsepower rating
Typical efficiency:
- 95-97% at full load
- 92-95% at 50% load
Harmonics mitigation:
- Use line reactors (3-5% impedance)
- Or passive harmonic filters
Practical Design Considerations
- Duct design: Size for actual diversity, not sum of peaks
- Minimum flow: Verify ventilation requirements at all loads
- Bypass dampers: Avoid—waste energy
- Pressure sensors: Place at representative location (2/3 point)
- Commissioning: Verify minimum flow, diversity factors, reset strategies
Related Technical Guides:
References:
- ASHRAE Handbook of HVAC Systems and Equipment, Chapter 48: Variable-Flow Systems
- ASHRAE Guideline 36: High-Performance Sequences of Operation for HVAC Systems
- Taylor Engineering: “Optimizing Design & Control of Chilled Water Plants”