Energy Recovery Systems for HVAC Engineers
Energy Recovery Systems for HVAC Engineers
Energy recovery reduces ventilation loads by transferring energy between exhaust and outdoor air streams. Proper selection and sizing can reduce HVAC energy consumption by 20-40% in high-ventilation applications.
Energy Recovery Types
Heat Recovery Ventilator (HRV)
Transfers: Sensible heat only
Applications: Cold/dry climates (avoid over-humidification in winter)
Effectiveness: 60-80% sensible
Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV)
Transfers: Sensible + latent heat (total energy)
Applications: Hot/humid climates, high latent loads
Effectiveness: 60-80% total, 50-70% latent
Technology Types
Rotary Wheel (Air-to-Air Exchanger)
Characteristics:
- Rotating desiccant-coated wheel
- Transfers sensible + latent (ERV)
- High effectiveness (70-85%)
- Cross-contamination: 1-5% (purge sector reduces)
Advantages: Highest effectiveness, lowest pressure drop Disadvantages: Moving parts, cross-contamination, requires maintenance
Plate Heat Exchanger
Characteristics:
- Stationary plates separate airstreams
- Transfers sensible only (unless with permeable membrane)
- Effectiveness: 50-75%
- Zero cross-contamination
Advantages: No moving parts, reliable, no cross-contamination Disadvantages: Lower effectiveness, higher pressure drop
Heat Pipe
Characteristics:
- Refrigerant-filled pipes transfer heat
- Sensible only
- Effectiveness: 45-65%
- Zero cross-contamination
Advantages: Passive (no power), no moving parts Disadvantages: Limited effectiveness, orientation-sensitive
Run-Around Loop
Characteristics:
- Glycol loop connects coils in exhaust and supply ducts
- Allows separated air handlers
- Effectiveness: 45-65%
Advantages: Flexible placement, no cross-contamination Disadvantages: Pump energy, glycol maintenance
Effectiveness
Sensible effectiveness:
$$\epsilon_s = \frac{T_{supply,leaving} - T_{OA}}{T_{exhaust} - T_{OA}}$$
Total effectiveness:
$$\epsilon_t = \frac{h_{supply,leaving} - h_{OA}}{h_{exhaust} - h_{OA}}$$
Energy Savings
Annual heating energy recovery:
$$Q_{recover} = 1.08 \times CFM \times \epsilon_s \times HDD \times 24$$
Annual cooling energy recovery:
$$Q_{recover} = 4.5 \times CFM \times \epsilon_t \times CDD \times 24$$
Typical payback: 3-8 years depending on climate, utility rates, ventilation rates
Frost Control
Problem: When exhaust air moisture freezes on cold wheel/plates
Occurs: Outdoor air < 15-25°F with high indoor humidity
Strategies:
- Preheat outdoor air: Electric or hot water coil before wheel
- Bypass outdoor air: Route some OA around wheel
- Wheel rotation modulation: Slow or stop rotation
- Exhaust air recirculation: Reduce exhaust airflow (warms wheel)
Pressure Drop
Typical:
- Rotary wheel: 0.4-0.8 “w.g. (each side)
- Plate exchanger: 0.6-1.2 “w.g.
- Heat pipe: 0.3-0.6 “w.g.
Fan power penalty must be considered in energy analysis
Applications
High-benefit applications:
- High outdoor air rates (100% OA systems, DOAS)
- Long operating hours (24/7 facilities)
- Extreme climates (very cold winters or hot/humid summers)
- Healthcare (high ventilation codes)
- Schools (high occupant density)
Low-benefit applications:
- Low outdoor air rates (< 20%)
- Mild climates
- Short operating hours
- Where cross-contamination unacceptable (unless using plate/run-around)
Practical Design
- Sizing: Match outdoor air CFM to ensure balanced flows
- Effectiveness: Select 65-75% for cost/performance balance
- Frost control: Required in climates with winter design < 20°F
- Maintenance: Plan filter access, wheel cleaning (annually)
Related Technical Guides:
References:
- ASHRAE Handbook of HVAC Systems and Equipment, Chapter 26: Air-to-Air Energy Recovery Equipment
- ASHRAE Standard 84: Method of Testing Air-to-Air Heat/Energy Exchangers
- AHRI Standard 1060: Performance Rating of Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers for Energy Recovery Ventilation Equipment