HVAC Systems Encyclopedia

A comprehensive encyclopedia of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems

Dehumidification Systems for Natatoriums

Fundamental Physics of Pool Evaporation

Water evaporation from pool surfaces represents the primary moisture load in natatoriums. The evaporation rate depends on the vapor pressure differential between the saturated air at the water surface and the ambient air above.

The mass transfer driving force follows:

$$\dot{m}{evap} = h_m \cdot A \cdot (W{sat,pool} - W_{air})$$

where:

  • $\dot{m}_{evap}$ = evaporation rate (lb/hr or kg/hr)
  • $h_m$ = mass transfer coefficient (ft/hr or m/hr)
  • $A$ = pool surface area (ft² or m²)
  • $W_{sat,pool}$ = humidity ratio at pool surface temperature (lb/lb or kg/kg)
  • $W_{air}$ = humidity ratio of room air (lb/lb or kg/kg)

ASHRAE Evaporation Rate Calculation

ASHRAE Applications Handbook provides empirical correlations accounting for pool activity levels:

$$E = A \cdot F_a \cdot (p_{w,pool} - p_{w,air}) \cdot \left(0.089 + 0.0782v\right)$$

where:

  • $E$ = evaporation rate (lb/hr)
  • $A$ = pool area (ft²)
  • $F_a$ = activity factor (0.5 unoccupied, 0.65 residential, 1.0 public pools)
  • $p_{w,pool}$ = saturation vapor pressure at pool temperature (in. Hg)
  • $p_{w,air}$ = vapor pressure of room air (in. Hg)
  • $v$ = air velocity over water surface (typically 10-30 fpm)

The vapor pressure differential drives continuous moisture addition. A 3,000 ft² public pool at 82°F with 50% RH air at 78°F generates approximately 180-240 lb/hr of moisture requiring removal.

Refrigerant-Based Dehumidification

Refrigerant dehumidifiers operate on the vapor compression cycle, cooling air below its dew point to condense moisture.

graph LR
    A[Humid Pool Air] --> B[Evaporator Coil]
    B --> C[Moisture Condensation]
    C --> D[Cold Dry Air]
    D --> E[Condenser Coil]
    E --> F[Warm Dry Air]
    F --> G[Return to Pool Space]
    C --> H[Condensate Drain]

    style B fill:#e3f2fd
    style E fill:#ffebee
    style C fill:#e8f5e9

Operating Principles

The refrigeration cycle removes latent heat while the condenser reheat provides sensible cooling compensation:

$$Q_{latent} = \dot{m}{water} \cdot h{fg}$$

where $h_{fg}$ = 1,060 BTU/lb at typical conditions.

For 200 lb/hr moisture removal:

$$Q_{latent} = 200 \times 1,060 = 212,000 \text{ BTU/hr} = 17.7 \text{ tons}$$

The refrigerant system simultaneously provides:

  • Evaporator cooling: Condenses moisture + sensible cooling
  • Condenser reheat: Recovers sensible heat to prevent overcooling

Net energy recovery efficiency typically reaches 50-70%, reducing heating requirements.

Refrigerant System Performance

ParameterTypical RangeNotes
Evaporator Temperature45-55°FBelow dew point for condensation
Condensing Temperature105-125°FDetermines reheat capacity
Moisture Removal10-25 lb/hr/tonDepends on entering conditions
Energy Efficiency3.5-5.0 lb/kWhIncluding reheat benefit
Operating Range50-90°F DBLimited by refrigerant properties
Humidity Control Range40-60% RHOptimal natatorium conditions

Desiccant Dehumidification

Desiccant systems use hygroscopic materials to adsorb water vapor through chemical attraction rather than cooling condensation.

graph TB
    A[Process Air Stream] --> B[Desiccant Wheel]
    B --> C[Dry Air Output]
    C --> D[Pool Space]

    E[Reactivation Air] --> F[Heating Coil]
    F --> G[Hot Air to Wheel]
    G --> B
    G --> H[Moisture Exhaust]

    I[Heat Recovery] -.->|Optional| F

    style B fill:#fff9c4
    style F fill:#ffccbc
    style I fill:#c8e6c9

Sorption Thermodynamics

Desiccants (silica gel, molecular sieves, lithium chloride) attract water molecules through:

  1. Physical adsorption: Van der Waals forces on porous surfaces
  2. Chemical adsorption: Molecular bonding with active sites

The adsorption process releases heat of sorption:

$$q_{ads} = h_{fg} + q_{wetting}$$

where $q_{wetting}$ = 50-100 BTU/lb additional heat release.

Regeneration requires heating to reverse the process:

$$Q_{regen} = \dot{m}{water} \cdot (h{fg} + q_{wetting}) + Q_{sensible}$$

Desiccant System Characteristics

ParameterTypical RangeNotes
Moisture Removal8-20 lb/hr/tonHigher at low humidity
Regeneration Temperature180-250°FDetermines energy use
Wheel Rotation Speed6-20 rev/hrAffects capacity
Dew Point Depression20-40°FBelow entering conditions
Operating Range-20 to 120°FNo freezing limitations
Humidity Range10-90% RHEffective at low humidity

System Comparison Analysis

CriteriaRefrigerant SystemDesiccant System
Initial CostLower ($15-25/lb/day)Higher ($25-40/lb/day)
Operating CostLower with electricVariable with fuel source
Humidity ControlGood (40-60% RH)Excellent (20-80% RH)
Low TemperaturePoor (freezing risk)Excellent
Energy RecoveryIntegrated condenserRequires heat exchanger
MaintenanceModerate complexityHigher complexity
Part Load EfficiencyGood with VFDExcellent
Space RequirementsCompactLarger footprint

Pool Cover Effects

Pool covers dramatically reduce evaporation rates through physical vapor barrier and activity suppression.

Evaporation Reduction Factors

Cover TypeEvaporation ReductionTypical Application
No Cover0% (baseline)Active use periods
Floating Discs30-40%During operation
Manual Cover90-95%Overnight/weekends
Automatic Cover95-98%Automated scheduling
Rigid Cover98-99%Complete closure

For a pool generating 200 lb/hr uncovered, an automatic cover during 12-hour nightly closure reduces average moisture load to:

$$\dot{m}_{avg} = 200 \times 0.5 + 200 \times 0.02 \times 0.5 = 102 \text{ lb/hr}$$

This 49% reduction translates to:

  • 49% lower dehumidification capacity requirement
  • Reduced equipment size and first cost
  • Lower operating energy consumption
  • Extended equipment service life

Energy Recovery Integration

Energy recovery substantially improves natatorium dehumidification economics.

Heat Recovery Wheel

Rotating enthalpy wheels transfer both sensible and latent energy between exhaust and supply streams:

$$\varepsilon_{total} = \frac{h_{supply,leaving} - h_{supply,entering}}{h_{exhaust} - h_{supply,entering}}$$

Typical effectiveness: 70-85% total energy recovery.

Heat Pipe Heat Exchanger

Passive refrigerant-charged pipes transfer sensible heat:

$$Q_{recovered} = \varepsilon \cdot \dot{m}{air} \cdot c_p \cdot (T{exhaust} - T_{supply})$$

Typical effectiveness: 50-70% sensible heat recovery.

Energy Recovery Benefits

StrategyAnnual Energy SavingsPayback Period
Heat Recovery Wheel30-45%3-6 years
Heat Pipe Exchanger20-30%4-7 years
Condenser Heat Recovery15-25%2-4 years
Pool Cover (automatic)40-60%1-3 years
Combined Strategies60-75%2-5 years

System Sizing Methodology

Step 1: Calculate peak evaporation rate using ASHRAE method with activity factors.

Step 2: Determine outdoor air ventilation per ASHRAE 62.1 (0.48 cfm/ft² pool + 0.06 cfm/ft² deck).

Step 3: Calculate total moisture load:

$$\dot{m}{total} = \dot{m}{evap} + \dot{m}{ventilation} + \dot{m}{occupants}$$

Step 4: Size dehumidification capacity with 15-25% safety factor.

Step 5: Select refrigerant vs. desiccant based on climate, energy costs, and humidity requirements.

Step 6: Integrate energy recovery for economic optimization.

ASHRAE Design Recommendations

Per ASHRAE Applications Handbook Chapter 6 (Natatoriums):

  • Maintain pool space: 78-82°F, 50-60% RH
  • Pool water temperature: 78-82°F (2-4°F warmer than air)
  • Air velocity over pool surface: minimize to 10-20 fpm
  • Outdoor air: 0.48 cfm/ft² pool area minimum
  • Exhaust air: maintain negative pressure (-0.02 to -0.05 in. w.c.)
  • Dehumidification capacity: handle peak + 25% margin
  • Emergency ventilation: 6 air changes per hour
  • Chloramine control: enhanced outdoor air or secondary treatment

Proper dehumidification system selection and sizing ensures comfortable conditions, building envelope protection, and energy-efficient operation throughout the facility lifecycle.