Azeotropic Mixtures
Azeotrope Definition and Thermodynamic Behavior
An azeotropic mixture is a blend of two or more refrigerants that exhibits constant boiling point behavior at a specific composition. The vapor and liquid phases maintain identical compositions during phase change processes.
Fundamental Characteristics
Thermodynamic Properties:
- Constant boiling point at fixed pressure
- No temperature glide during evaporation or condensation
- Vapor composition equals liquid composition at equilibrium
- Behaves as a single-component refrigerant
- Consistent properties throughout phase change
Gibbs Phase Rule Application:
For an azeotropic mixture at equilibrium:
F = C - P + 2
Where:
- F = degrees of freedom
- C = number of components
- P = number of phases
During phase change (P = 2), a binary azeotrope (C = 2) has two degrees of freedom (pressure and temperature are dependent).
Phase Behavior
Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium:
At the azeotropic point:
- x₁ = y₁ (liquid mole fraction equals vapor mole fraction)
- No composition change during boiling or condensation
- Single saturation temperature at given pressure
- P-T diagram identical to pure refrigerant behavior
Deviation from Raoult’s Law:
Azeotropes exhibit non-ideal behavior described by:
P = x₁γ₁P₁ˢᵃᵗ + x₂γ₂P₂ˢᵃᵗ
Where:
- γ = activity coefficient (deviates from unity)
- Pˢᵃᵗ = saturation pressure of pure component
- x = liquid mole fraction
Positive azeotropes (lower boiling point than components) and negative azeotropes (higher boiling point) exist based on activity coefficient behavior.
Common Azeotropic Refrigerants
R-500 (R-12/152a Azeotrope)
Composition:
- 73.8% R-12 (CCl₂F₂) by weight
- 26.2% R-152a (CHF₂CH₃) by weight
- Azeotropic at atmospheric pressure
Thermodynamic Properties:
| Parameter | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Boiling Point (1 atm) | -28.0°C | (-18.4°F) |
| Critical Temperature | 105.5°C | (221.9°F) |
| Critical Pressure | 4.43 | MPa |
| Molecular Weight | 99.3 | g/mol |
| Liquid Density (25°C) | 1.207 | g/cm³ |
| Vapor Density (25°C, 1 atm) | 4.16 | kg/m³ |
Performance Characteristics:
- Higher capacity than R-12 (approximately 15% increase)
- Lower discharge temperature than R-12
- Better energy efficiency in many applications
- Suitable for direct R-12 replacement in many systems
Status:
- Phase-out under Montreal Protocol (contains CFC-12)
- No longer manufactured in developed countries
- Historically used in air conditioning and refrigeration
- Replaced by HFC and HFO alternatives
R-502 (R-22/115 Azeotrope)
Composition:
- 48.8% R-22 (CHClF₂) by weight
- 51.2% R-115 (CClF₂CF₃) by weight
- Near-azeotropic behavior (temperature glide < 0.3°C)
Thermodynamic Properties:
| Parameter | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Boiling Point (1 atm) | -45.4°C | (-49.7°F) |
| Critical Temperature | 82.2°C | (180.0°F) |
| Critical Pressure | 4.08 | MPa |
| Molecular Weight | 111.6 | g/mol |
| Liquid Density (25°C) | 1.205 | g/cm³ |
| Ozone Depletion Potential | 0.33 | - |
Applications:
- Low-temperature refrigeration systems
- Commercial freezers and walk-in coolers
- Supermarket display cases
- Ice-making equipment
- Transport refrigeration
Operational Advantages:
- Lower discharge temperatures than R-22 alone
- Suitable for evaporator temperatures to -40°C
- Good volumetric capacity
- Compatible with mineral oil lubricants
- Lower compression ratios at low temperatures
Phase-Out Status:
- Banned under Montreal Protocol (contains HCFC-22 and CFC-115)
- Production ceased in developed countries (2020)
- Replaced by R-404A, R-507A, and newer alternatives
- Servicing allowed with reclaimed refrigerant
R-507A (R-125/143a Azeotrope)
Composition:
- 50% R-125 (CHF₂CF₃) by weight
- 50% R-143a (CH₃CF₃) by weight
- True azeotropic blend (zero temperature glide)
Thermodynamic Properties:
| Parameter | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Boiling Point (1 atm) | -46.7°C | (-52.1°F) |
| Critical Temperature | 70.9°C | (159.6°F) |
| Critical Pressure | 3.79 | MPa |
| Molecular Weight | 98.9 | g/mol |
| Liquid Density (25°C) | 1.107 | g/cm³ |
| Global Warming Potential | 3985 | (100-yr) |
| Ozone Depletion Potential | 0 | - |
Applications:
- R-502 retrofit and replacement
- Low-temperature commercial refrigeration
- Supermarket refrigeration systems
- Cold storage facilities
- Process cooling applications
Performance Characteristics:
- Capacity similar to R-502
- Energy efficiency comparable to R-502
- Higher discharge temperatures than R-502
- Requires POE or PVE synthetic lubricants
- Non-flammable (ASHRAE A1 classification)
System Considerations:
- Incompatible with mineral oil
- Higher operating pressures than R-502
- Requires different expansion device sizing
- Low-GWP alternatives now preferred for new installations
R-508A and R-508B
R-508A Composition:
- 39% R-23 (CHF₃) by weight
- 61% R-116 (CF₃CF₃) by weight
R-508B Composition:
- 46% R-23 (CHF₃) by weight
- 54% R-116 (CF₃CF₃) by weight
Properties:
| Parameter | R-508A | R-508B | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boiling Point (1 atm) | -87.8°C | -87.0°C | (-126.0°F, -124.6°F) |
| Critical Temperature | 11.2°C | 11.8°C | (52.2°F, 53.2°F) |
| Critical Pressure | 3.77 | 3.82 | MPa |
Applications:
- Ultra-low temperature refrigeration (-70°C to -90°C)
- Cascade refrigeration systems (low stage)
- Laboratory freezers
- Medical storage equipment
- Cryogenic applications
Constant Composition Behavior
Phase Change Characteristics
Evaporation Process:
Unlike zeotropic blends, azeotropes maintain constant composition:
- Initial Liquid State: Composition = 50% A / 50% B
- Partial Evaporation: Vapor and liquid both = 50% A / 50% B
- Complete Evaporation: Final vapor = 50% A / 50% B
No Fractionation:
- All molecules evaporate proportionally
- No preferential boiling of lighter components
- Liquid composition remains constant
- Vapor composition equals liquid composition
Temperature Profile
Saturation Behavior:
During phase change at constant pressure:
- T_evap = constant (no glide)
- Single saturation point on P-T diagram
- Superheat and subcooling clearly defined
- Log P-h diagram appearance identical to pure refrigerant
Pressure-Temperature Relationship:
For azeotropic mixtures:
ln(P) = A - B/(T + C)
Where A, B, C are mixture-specific constants, and the relationship follows the same form as pure refrigerants.
Thermodynamic Advantages
Single Boiling Point Benefits:
Predictable Performance:
- Constant evaporator temperature
- Consistent superheat control
- No glide compensation required in controls
Heat Transfer Efficiency:
- Isothermal evaporation and condensation
- Maximum LMTD (Log Mean Temperature Difference)
- No mass transfer resistance within blend
System Design:
- Standard expansion device sizing
- Conventional superheat settings (5-7°C typical)
- Simple pressure-temperature charts
Control System Simplicity:
- Single saturation temperature at given pressure
- Standard thermostatic expansion valve operation
- Conventional pressure control strategies
Applications and System Selection
Commercial Refrigeration
Low-Temperature Applications:
- Display freezers: R-507A
- Walk-in freezers: R-507A, R-404A
- Ice cream cabinets: R-507A
- Frozen food storage: R-507A
Advantages in Commercial Systems:
- Simplified inventory management (single blend)
- Consistent performance across equipment
- Standardized service procedures
- Compatible with liquid level control
Industrial Refrigeration
Process Cooling:
- Food processing: R-507A for low temperatures
- Chemical manufacturing: R-508A for ultra-low temperatures
- Pharmaceutical production: Clean azeotropes (HFC-based)
Cascade Systems:
- High stage: R-134a, R-404A
- Low stage: R-508A, R-508B
- Ultra-low stage: R-23 or azeotropic blends
HVAC Applications
Limited Use in Comfort Cooling:
- Most HVAC systems use pure refrigerants or zeotropes
- R-410A (near-azeotropic) dominant in residential/light commercial
- Azeotropes historically used in centrifugal chillers (R-500)
Retrofit Applications
R-502 to R-507A Conversion:
| Parameter | R-502 | R-507A | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 100% | 98-102% | Minimal |
| Energy Efficiency | Baseline | +2 to -3% | Similar |
| Discharge Temperature | Lower | +5 to +10°C | Higher |
| Lubricant | Mineral Oil | POE/PVE | Required Change |
| Operating Pressure | Baseline | +5 to +10% | Higher |
Retrofit Procedure:
- Recover existing R-502 refrigerant
- Replace mineral oil with POE lubricant
- Replace filter-drier with compatible core
- Check elastomer compatibility (seals, gaskets)
- Adjust expansion device if necessary
- Evacuate to 500 microns or lower
- Charge with R-507A to specifications
- Verify superheat and subcooling
Charging Considerations
Liquid Charging Requirement
Phase Independence:
- Azeotropes can be charged as liquid or vapor
- Composition remains constant regardless of charging method
- No fractionation during cylinder discharge
- Tank pressure unchanged by liquid vs. vapor draw
Charging Methods:
Liquid Charging (Preferred):
- Faster charging process
- More accurate weight measurements
- Suitable for large systems
- Use liquid service valve on cylinder
Vapor Charging (Acceptable):
- Slower process
- Prevents liquid slugging into compressor
- Required for small charges
- Safe for operating systems
Quantity Determination
Charging by Weight:
Calculate required charge:
W = V × ρ_liquid × FF
Where:
- W = refrigerant weight (kg)
- V = system liquid volume (L)
- ρ_liquid = liquid density (kg/L)
- FF = fill factor (typically 0.80-0.85)
Charging by Subcooling:
- Charge to nominal weight (80-90% of calculated)
- Operate system at design conditions
- Measure liquid line temperature
- Measure liquid line pressure
- Calculate subcooling = T_sat(P) - T_actual
- Target subcooling: 4-7°C for typical systems
- Add refrigerant if subcooling < target
Charging by Superheat:
For systems without receiver:
- Measure suction line temperature
- Measure suction line pressure
- Calculate superheat = T_actual - T_sat(P)
- Target superheat: 5-10°C at design conditions
- Add refrigerant if superheat > target
- Remove refrigerant if superheat < target
System Fill Limits
Safety Considerations:
| System Type | Max Fill Factor | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Hermetic Systems | 85% | Prevent liquid overcharge |
| Semi-hermetic Systems | 80% | Thermal expansion allowance |
| Open-Drive Systems | 75% | Oil return considerations |
| Flooded Systems | 60-70% | Liquid level control |
Leak Behavior and Servicing
Composition Stability After Leaks
Azeotropic Advantage:
When system leaks occur:
- Vapor and liquid leak at identical composition
- Remaining refrigerant maintains original blend ratio
- No change in thermodynamic properties
- No performance degradation from composition shift
Comparison with Zeotropic Blends:
| Characteristic | Azeotrope | Zeotrope |
|---|---|---|
| Composition after vapor leak | Unchanged | Shifts toward heavier components |
| Performance after leak | Consistent | May degrade |
| Top-off charging | Simple addition | Requires liquid charging |
| Partial charge acceptable | Yes | No (composition unknown) |
| Requires complete recovery | Only when contaminated | After any significant leak |
Service Procedures
Leak Detection:
- Electronic leak detectors (heated diode or infrared)
- Bubble solution for visual confirmation
- Ultrasonic leak detectors for large leaks
- Fluorescent dye with UV light
Topping Off Charge:
For azeotropic blends:
- Locate and repair leak
- Add refrigerant (liquid or vapor acceptable)
- No composition correction needed
- Verify charge by subcooling or superheat
- Document refrigerant added
Recovery and Recycling:
Azeotropes can be:
- Recovered using standard equipment
- Recycled on-site (filtered and dehydrated)
- Reclaimed to ARI-700 standards
- Mixed with same refrigerant designation
Contamination Handling:
If contaminated (acid, moisture, air):
- Complete refrigerant recovery required
- System cleanup (flush or component replacement)
- Oil change and filter-drier replacement
- Evacuate to deep vacuum (500 microns)
- Recharge with virgin or reclaimed refrigerant
Comparison with Zeotropic Blends
Thermodynamic Differences
Phase Change Behavior:
| Property | Azeotrope | Zeotrope |
|---|---|---|
| Boiling Point | Single value | Range (temperature glide) |
| Dew-Bubble Spread | Zero | 2-10°C typical |
| Composition Stability | Constant | Changes during phase change |
| Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium | x = y | x ≠ y |
| Fractionation | None | Occurs during leaks |
Performance Implications:
Azeotropic Advantages:
- Isothermal heat transfer (higher effectiveness)
- Predictable saturation temperature
- Simple P-T charts
- No glide considerations in system design
- Standard control algorithms
Zeotropic Advantages:
- Temperature glide can improve heat exchanger performance
- Better match to temperature profiles in some applications
- Countercurrent heat exchange benefits
- Potentially higher efficiency in specific designs
System Design Differences
Expansion Device Sizing:
Azeotropes:
- Standard orifice sizing methods
- Single saturation temperature assumed
- Conventional superheat control
- TXV selection per manufacturer tables
Zeotropes:
- Must account for bubble point temperature
- Glide affects available subcooling
- Superheat measured from bubble point
- Modified selection procedures
Heat Exchanger Design:
Evaporator:
Azeotropes:
- Constant evaporation temperature
- LMTD = (ΔT₁ - ΔT₂) / ln(ΔT₁/ΔT₂)
- Standard approach temperature design
Zeotropes:
- Temperature increases during evaporation
- Can improve LMTD in counterflow arrangements
- Requires integration of temperature profile
Condenser:
Azeotropes:
- Constant condensing temperature
- Simple subcooling section design
- Standard approach calculations
Zeotropes:
- Temperature decreases during condensation
- Glide zone requires separate analysis
- Potential for closer approach with cooling medium
Service and Maintenance Differences
Charging Procedures:
| Aspect | Azeotrope | Zeotrope |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Method | Liquid or vapor | Liquid only (typically) |
| Partial Charging | Acceptable | Acceptable |
| Top-Off After Leak | Simple addition | Liquid addition preferred |
| Composition Concern | None | Critical |
| Cylinder Handling | Any orientation | Liquid valve required |
Leak Management:
Azeotrope Protocol:
- Repair leak
- Add refrigerant as needed
- Verify charge
- Return to service
Zeotrope Protocol:
- Repair leak
- Assess leak magnitude
- Consider recovery if >10% lost
- Add liquid refrigerant
- Verify charge and performance
- May require complete recovery/recharge if significant vapor leak
Equipment Considerations
Compressor Selection
Displacement Requirements:
For azeotropic refrigerants, calculate required displacement:
V_disp = (Q_evap × v_g) / (h_1 - h_4) / η_v
Where:
- V_disp = compressor displacement (m³/h)
- Q_evap = evaporator capacity (kW)
- v_g = specific volume of vapor (m³/kg)
- h_1 - h_4 = refrigeration effect (kJ/kg)
- η_v = volumetric efficiency
Discharge Temperature Considerations:
| Refrigerant | Typical T_discharge | Concern Level |
|---|---|---|
| R-507A | 65-80°C | Moderate |
| R-404A | 70-85°C | Moderate-High |
| R-502 | 55-70°C | Low |
| R-22 | 70-90°C | Moderate-High |
Temperature Control:
- Liquid injection for R-507A if T_discharge > 90°C
- Economizer cycles reduce discharge temperature
- Oversized condensers lower condensing pressure and temperature
Lubricant Compatibility
Oil Selection by Refrigerant:
| Azeotrope | Compatible Lubricants | Viscosity Grade |
|---|---|---|
| R-500 (legacy) | Mineral Oil, AB | ISO 32-68 |
| R-502 (legacy) | Mineral Oil, AB | ISO 32-68 |
| R-507A | POE, PVE | ISO 32-68 |
| R-508A/B | POE | ISO 32-68 |
| R-410A | POE, PVE | ISO 32-68 |
POE Lubricant Characteristics:
- Miscible with HFC refrigerants at all temperatures
- Hygroscopic (absorbs moisture readily)
- Requires handling in dry environment
- Oil return similar to mineral oil systems
- Acid number < 0.05 mg KOH/g required
System Component Materials
Elastomer Compatibility:
HFC-based azeotropes affect elastomers differently than CFCs:
| Material | CFC Compatibility | HFC Compatibility |
|---|---|---|
| Nitrile (Buna-N) | Excellent | Poor to Fair |
| HNBR | Good | Excellent |
| Neoprene | Good | Good |
| EPDM | Fair | Good |
| Viton | Excellent | Excellent |
Recommended Materials for HFC Azeotropes:
- Seals: HNBR, Viton
- Gaskets: EPDM, Neoprene
- O-rings: HNBR, Viton
- Hoses: Barrier-type with HFC-compatible liner
Filter-Drier Selection
Desiccant Types:
For azeotropic HFC refrigerants:
- Molecular sieve (Type 3A or 4A preferred)
- Activated alumina (secondary)
- Silica gel (not recommended for HFCs)
Sizing Criteria:
- Water removal capacity ≥ 30% by weight
- Acid removal capacity considered
- Pressure drop < 2 psi at design flow
- Replaceable core for large systems
Moisture Limits:
| Refrigerant Type | Max Moisture Content | Method |
|---|---|---|
| HFC Azeotropes | 50 ppm | Karl Fischer |
| HCFC Blends | 100 ppm | Karl Fischer |
| CFC Blends (legacy) | 100 ppm | Karl Fischer |
Expansion Devices
TXV Selection:
Azeotropic refrigerants use standard TXV sizing:
- Calculate refrigerant mass flow rate
- Select valve for application refrigerant
- Use single saturation temperature
- Standard superheat settings (5-7°C)
- No glide correction factors needed
Electronic Expansion Valves:
Benefits for azeotropic systems:
- Precise superheat control (±0.5°C)
- Adaptive control algorithms
- Fast response to load changes
- Integrated with building management systems
Capillary Tube Sizing:
For fixed-orifice applications:
L = (π² × d⁴ × ΔP) / (128 × μ × ṁ)
Where:
- L = tube length (m)
- d = inside diameter (m)
- ΔP = pressure drop (Pa)
- μ = dynamic viscosity (Pa·s)
- ṁ = mass flow rate (kg/s)
Azeotropes allow standard capillary sizing methods without glide considerations.
Safety and Environmental Considerations
Safety Classification
ASHRAE Standard 34 Classifications:
| Refrigerant | Safety Class | Flammability | Toxicity |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-500 | A1 | None | Low |
| R-502 | A1 | None | Low |
| R-507A | A1 | None | Low |
| R-508A/B | A1 | None | Low |
Class A1 Characteristics:
- Non-flammable at all concentrations
- Low toxicity (>400 ppm exposure limit)
- Suitable for occupied spaces
- Minimal safety restrictions
Environmental Impact
Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP):
| Refrigerant | ODP | Status |
|---|---|---|
| R-500 | 0.74 | Banned (Montreal Protocol) |
| R-502 | 0.33 | Phased out |
| R-507A | 0 | Legal but high GWP |
| R-508A/B | 0 | Legal but high GWP |
Global Warming Potential (GWP):
| Refrigerant | GWP (100-yr) | Regulatory Status |
|---|---|---|
| R-507A | 3985 | Kigali Amendment restrictions |
| R-404A | 3922 | Banned in new EU equipment |
| R-410A | 2088 | Under review |
| R-508A | 13,214 | Restricted to specific uses |
Future Trends
Low-GWP Alternatives:
Replacing azeotropic blends:
- R-448A, R-449A replacing R-507A (GWP ~1400)
- R-454B replacing R-410A (GWP ~466)
- R-513A as R-134a alternative (GWP ~631)
- Natural refrigerants (CO₂, ammonia) for specific applications
Note: New alternatives are typically zeotropic blends, sacrificing composition stability for environmental benefits.
References:
- ASHRAE Handbook - Fundamentals, Chapter on Thermodynamics
- ASHRAE Standard 34: Designation and Safety Classification of Refrigerants
- ASHRAE Handbook - Refrigeration, Chapter on Refrigerants
- ARI Standard 700: Specifications for Refrigerants