Schematic Design Phase
The schematic design (SD) phase establishes the fundamental HVAC system concepts and approaches that will define the project through subsequent design phases. This phase translates Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) and architectural concepts into viable HVAC strategies, providing sufficient technical detail to support cost estimating and design decision-making.
Phase Objectives and Deliverables
The schematic design phase produces:
- System concept narratives with comparative analysis
- Preliminary load calculations (typically 15-20% accuracy)
- Major equipment schedules with capacities
- Space allocation diagrams for mechanical rooms
- Single-line schematic HVAC diagrams
- Preliminary energy analysis
- Budget-level cost estimates (±25% accuracy)
- Basis of Design documentation
These deliverables enable the owner to evaluate system alternatives, understand first cost implications, and assess operational characteristics before committing to detailed design.
System Concept Development
Load Analysis Methodology
Preliminary load calculations during schematic design employ simplified methods appropriate to the conceptual nature of the phase:
Cooling Load Estimation:
- Envelope loads: U·A·ΔT calculations using assumed assembly values
- Internal gains: Area-based assumptions (W/ft² by space type)
- Ventilation loads: 1.1·CFM·ΔT + 4840·CFM·Δω
- Simultaneous diversity: Apply block load methods
- Safety factors: 10-15% for equipment sizing uncertainty
Heating Load Estimation:
- Transmission: U·A·ΔT for all envelope components
- Infiltration: Simplified air change method or area/perimeter method
- Humidification: If required, based on ventilation air and infiltration
- Pickup loads: Proportional estimates based on building mass
For block load calculations during SD phase:
Q_total = Q_envelope + Q_internal + Q_ventilation + Q_infiltration
Where:
Q_envelope = Σ(U·A·CLTD) for walls, roof, glazing
Q_internal = (People·ΔT·1.1·CFM/person) + (Lights·W/ft²·A) + (Equipment·W/ft²·A)
Q_ventilation = 1.1·CFM_oa·ΔT + 4840·CFM_oa·Δω
The coefficient 1.1 derives from ρ·c_p = 1.08 Btu/(hr·ft³·°F) for sensible heat, and 4840 for latent heat represents the product of air density, specific heat of vaporization, and unit conversions.
System Selection Criteria
HVAC system selection during schematic design evaluates multiple alternatives against weighted criteria:
Performance Factors:
- Thermal control capability (zone-level vs. space-level)
- Indoor air quality delivery (ventilation effectiveness)
- Acoustical performance (NC/RC criteria compliance)
- Humidity control precision (if critical)
- Space temperature stratification potential
Economic Considerations:
- First cost (equipment + installation + infrastructure)
- Operating costs (energy + maintenance + replacement)
- Life-cycle cost analysis over evaluation period
- Utility incentives and rebates
- Future flexibility and expansion capability
Physical Constraints:
- Available mechanical space (equipment rooms, shafts, ceiling plenums)
- Structural load capacity for equipment
- Architectural coordination requirements
- Site constraints (outdoor equipment placement, louver locations)
- Code compliance paths
Operational Requirements:
- Maintenance accessibility and complexity
- Control system sophistication
- Part-load performance characteristics
- Redundancy requirements
- Operator skill level assumptions
Comparative System Analysis
Present 2-3 viable system alternatives with quantitative comparison:
| Criterion | Weight | VAV with Reheat | Chilled Beam | Fan Coil + DOAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Cost ($/ft²) | 25% | $28-32 | $32-38 | $24-28 |
| Energy Cost ($/ft²/yr) | 30% | $2.40 | $1.85 | $2.10 |
| Acoustics (NC) | 15% | 38-42 | 30-35 | 35-40 |
| Zone Control | 20% | Excellent | Good | Excellent |
| Ceiling Height Impact | 10% | 18-24" | 12-16" | 14-18" |
| Weighted Score | - | 75 | 82 | 71 |
Document assumptions clearly: climate zone, occupancy type, building configuration, local labor rates, utility costs.
Equipment Space Allocation
Mechanical Room Sizing
Schematic design establishes mechanical room areas using equipment-based methods:
Central Plant Rooms:
- Chiller plant: 0.15-0.25 ft²/ton (includes chillers, pumps, expansion tanks, VFDs, clearances)
- Boiler plant: 0.08-0.15 ft²/MBH (includes boilers, pumps, expansion, fuel train)
- Air handler rooms: Plan for 1.5x equipment footprint for maintenance access
- Add 20-30% circulation and service area beyond equipment footprints
Vertical Distribution:
- Mechanical shafts: Size for maximum floor supply/return risers plus 40% future
- Typical sizing: 1.0-1.5 ft² per 10,000 ft² served per floor
- Stack supply and return shafts separately for balancing flexibility
- Coordinate shaft locations with structural column grid
Equipment Access:
- Door sizes: Minimum 6’-0" × 8’-0" for central plant access
- Removal routes: Verify path from loading dock to mechanical rooms
- Rigging provisions: Coordinate structural support for equipment replacement
- Clearances: ASHRAE Guideline 1.1 maintenance access requirements
Ceiling Space Coordination
Establish ceiling plenum depth requirements:
Plenum Depth = Duct_depth + Pipe_depth + Electrical_depth + Clearance + Structure
Typical VAV System:
- Supply duct: 24-36" for mains (aspect ratio 4:1 maximum)
- Return duct/plenum: 18-24" if ducted returns
- Sprinkler piping: 4-6" below structure
- Electrical: 6-12" for conduit/cable tray
- Minimum clearance: 3-6" between systems
Total: 36-48" below structure to ceiling
Coordinate with architectural reflected ceiling plans to identify congestion zones and required soffits.
Major Equipment Selection
Capacity Determination
Size central plant equipment using block loads with appropriate diversity and safety factors:
Chiller Capacity:
Chiller Tons = (Peak Block Load / Diversity) × Safety Factor
Where:
Diversity = 0.85-0.95 for multiple zones
Safety Factor = 1.10-1.15 for load estimate uncertainty
For redundancy: N+1 configuration
Each chiller = Total Load / (N chillers) × 1.0
Boiler Capacity:
Boiler MBH = Peak Heating Load + Pickup Load + Piping Loss
Pickup Load = 0.20-0.30 × Steady State Load (depends on building mass)
Piping Loss = 0.10-0.15 × Steady State Load
For N+1 redundancy: Size each = Total / (N boilers)
Air Handler Sizing:
CFM = Sensible Load / (1.08 × ΔT)
Where ΔT = 18-22°F for cooling (schematic assumption)
ΔT = 40-70°F for heating
External Static Pressure = Filter + Coil + Duct + Terminal + Safety
Typical SD estimate: 2.5-4.0 inches w.g. total
Equipment Type Selection
Document preliminary equipment selections with key performance parameters:
Chillers:
- Type: Water-cooled centrifugal, air-cooled screw, magnetic bearing, etc.
- Full-load efficiency: kW/ton or COP
- Part-load performance: IPLV or NPLV
- Refrigerant type and charge volume
- Physical dimensions and weight
Boilers:
- Type: Condensing, non-condensing, fire-tube, water-tube
- Efficiency: Combustion efficiency and AFUE
- Turndown ratio capability
- Emissions: NOx, CO levels (if applicable)
- Fuel type and consumption rate
Air Handlers:
- Configuration: Draw-through, blow-through, custom
- Fan type: Plenum, housed, AFMS
- Coil rows: Cooling (6-8 row typical), heating (1-2 row)
- Filter type: MERV rating and pressure drop
- Casing construction: Double-wall insulated
Budget Development
Cost Estimating Methods
Schematic design cost estimates employ parametric methods:
Area-Based Estimating:
HVAC Cost = Area × ($/ft² factor) × Location Multiplier × Escalation
Where $/ft² varies by:
- Building type (office: $20-30, hospital: $45-65, lab: $60-90)
- System type (VAV +$0, radiant +$8-12, displacement +$5-8)
- Climate zone (extreme climates +10-20%)
System Component Method:
- Central plant: $/ton for cooling, $/MBH for heating
- Distribution: $/CFM for ductwork and air devices
- Terminal units: $/unit or $/CFM
- Controls: % of equipment cost (12-18% typical)
- Testing/commissioning: 1-3% of construction cost
Cost Breakdown Structure:
- Equipment: 40-50%
- Labor: 35-45%
- Materials (pipe, duct, supports): 10-15%
- Controls: 5-8%
- Testing and commissioning: 2-4%
Apply geographic cost indices from RSMeans, Dodge, or regional data.
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
Perform simplified LCC to inform system selection:
LCC = First Cost + PW(Operating Costs) + PW(Maintenance) - PW(Salvage)
Present Worth Factor = [(1 + i)^n - 1] / [i(1 + i)^n]
Where:
i = real discount rate (typically 3-5%)
n = evaluation period (20-25 years for HVAC)
Operating cost components:
- Energy: $/kWh × annual consumption × escalation
- Demand charges: $/kW-month × peak demand × 12
- Maintenance: % of first cost (typically 2-4% annually)
- Major replacements: Present worth of equipment replacement at mid-life
Document sensitivity to key assumptions (energy cost escalation, discount rate, equipment life).
Energy Analysis
Schematic Energy Modeling
Preliminary energy analysis during SD establishes baseline performance and evaluates alternatives:
Modeling Approach:
- Single-block or limited-zone models appropriate for SD
- Envelope: Representative wall/roof/glazing assemblies
- Lighting: Area-based assumptions (W/ft²)
- Equipment: Plug load density by space type
- Occupancy: Peak and schedule assumptions
- HVAC: System type with representative efficiencies
Baseline Performance: Establish energy use intensity (EUI) relative to benchmarks:
EUI = Annual Energy Use (kBtu) / Gross Floor Area (ft²)
Typical ranges by building type:
- Office: 50-80 kBtu/ft²/yr
- Retail: 60-100 kBtu/ft²/yr
- School: 55-85 kBtu/ft²/yr
- Hospital: 200-350 kBtu/ft²/yr
Energy Cost Index (ECI):
ECI = Annual Energy Cost ($) / Gross Floor Area (ft²)
Accounts for different utility rate structures and fuel costs
More meaningful than EUI for owner decision-making
Energy Conservation Strategies
Evaluate energy efficiency measures (EEMs) with incremental cost-effectiveness:
High-Performance HVAC Systems:
- Economizer cycles: Free cooling when OA < RA temperature
- Heat recovery: Sensible or total energy recovery (ERV)
- Variable-flow systems: VFD on pumps, fans for part-load efficiency
- High-efficiency equipment: Premium efficiency chillers, boilers, motors
Passive Strategies:
- Envelope optimization: Insulation, glazing performance, thermal mass
- Solar control: Shading, glazing orientation, external devices
- Natural ventilation: Where climate and program permit
- Daylighting integration: Reduced lighting loads and heat gain
Cost-Effectiveness Metrics:
Simple Payback = Incremental First Cost / Annual Energy Savings
If SPB < 7-10 years → Typically cost-effective
If SPB > 15 years → Requires non-energy justification
For incentive programs, calculate:
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR) = PW(Savings) / First Cost
SIR > 1.0 → Cost-effective over analysis period
Energy Code Compliance
Verify preliminary design meets or exceeds minimum code requirements:
Performance Path (ASHRAE 90.1):
- Proposed building EUI ≤ Baseline building EUI
- Model both using identical assumptions except HVAC/envelope measures
- Document percent better than baseline (0%, 10%, 20%+ for certifications)
Prescriptive Path:
- Equipment efficiencies: Minimum COP, EER, AFUE, combustion efficiency
- Economizers: Required for cooling capacity > thresholds
- Duct/pipe insulation: R-values per Table 6.8.3
- Controls: Setback, deadband, demand control ventilation
For projects targeting green building certification (LEED, Living Building Challenge, Passive House), establish energy performance targets during SD:
- LEED: 5-20% better than ASHRAE 90.1 baseline
- Net Zero Energy: EUI targets of 20-35 kBtu/ft²/yr (office)
- Passive House: 4.75 kBtu/ft²/yr heating + cooling demand
Schematic HVAC Drawings
Drawing Content and Scale
Schematic design drawings communicate system concepts graphically:
Floor Plan Drawings (1/16" = 1’-0" or 1/8" = 1’-0"):
- Major equipment locations (AHUs, fan coils, unit ventilators)
- Mechanical room layouts with access paths
- Primary duct/pipe distribution routes (single-line)
- Terminal device locations (VAV boxes, diffusers in schematic grid)
- Control zones indicated
- Coordinate with architectural furniture/partition plans
Single-Line Diagrams:
- System flow from source to end use
- Major equipment with capacity labels
- Control sequences indicated schematically
- Diversity and coincidence factors noted
- Pressure/temperature conditions at key points
Riser Diagrams:
- Vertical distribution of supply/return systems
- Equipment served per floor
- Shaft sizes and locations
- Isolation valve locations
- Expansion provisions
Mechanical Room Plans (1/4" = 1’-0"):
- Equipment footprints with manufacturer’s general dimensions
- Maintenance clearances per ASHRAE Guideline 1.1
- Access doors and equipment removal paths
- Floor drains and housekeeping pads
- Electrical/control panel locations
Coordination Elements
Indicate key coordination requirements:
Structural:
- Equipment loads (psf or concentrated loads in lbs)
- Roof equipment curb locations
- Vibration isolation requirements
- Penetration sizes through floors/walls
Architectural:
- Louver locations and free areas
- Mechanical room door sizes
- Ceiling height requirements and soffits
- Equipment screening requirements
Electrical:
- Electrical room adjacency to mechanical rooms
- Preliminary voltage and phase (480V/3ph, 208V/3ph)
- Approximate connected loads (kW)
- Emergency power requirements
Plumbing:
- Condenser water connections to cooling towers
- Domestic water for humidification/makeup
- Drainage for coil condensate and equipment drains
- Fuel gas piping to boilers/generators
Drawing Notes and Legends
Include standard schematic design notes:
“All quantities, capacities, and locations are preliminary and subject to refinement during design development.”
“Equipment selections based on preliminary load calculations; verify during detailed design.”
“Coordinate all mechanical equipment locations and distribution routing with structural, electrical, and plumbing systems.”
“Contractor shall verify all field dimensions before fabrication.”
Reference applicable design standards:
- ASHRAE 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings
- ASHRAE 62.1: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality
- IMC: International Mechanical Code
- Local amendments and jurisdictional requirements
Design Review and Approval
Internal Design Review
Conduct multidisciplinary design reviews to verify:
HVAC System Integrity:
- Load calculations reasonable for building type and climate
- Equipment capacities adequate with appropriate safety factors
- Distribution system can fit within architectural constraints
- Control strategies align with operational requirements
Interdisciplinary Coordination:
- Structural: Equipment loads within capacity, penetrations feasible
- Architectural: Space allocations adequate, aesthetic integration acceptable
- Electrical: Power availability, voltage compatibility, panel locations
- Plumbing: Water/drain connections feasible, no conflicts
Code and Standard Compliance:
- Energy code performance path or prescriptive compliance
- Ventilation rates per ASHRAE 62.1 or local code
- Mechanical code clearances and safety requirements
- Fire/life safety integration (smoke control, fire dampers)
Owner Review Process
Present schematic design to owner stakeholders:
Design Narrative:
- System selection rationale with pros/cons of alternatives
- How system meets OPR and Basis of Design
- Operational characteristics and maintenance implications
- Energy performance relative to goals
Cost Implications:
- First cost estimate with contingency
- Annual operating cost projections
- Life-cycle cost comparison if alternatives presented
- Value engineering opportunities identified
Schedule Impact:
- Long-lead equipment requiring early procurement
- Phasing requirements for occupied renovations
- Utility coordination needs (service upgrades)
Risk Assessment:
- Technical risks (unproven technologies, tight fits)
- Cost risks (market volatility, incomplete information)
- Schedule risks (permitting, utility lead times)
- Mitigation strategies proposed
Approval for Design Development
Obtain explicit owner approval to proceed:
System Selection Approval: Written acceptance of HVAC system type(s)
Budget Acceptance: Concurrence with cost estimate and contingency
Space Planning Approval: Acceptance of mechanical room sizes/locations
Energy Performance: Confirmation that preliminary energy analysis meets project goals
Design Criteria Sign-off: Approval of Basis of Design document
This approval establishes the design direction and prevents major changes during subsequent phases, which become increasingly costly to implement.
Transition to Design Development
Prepare for the design development phase:
Information Transfer:
- Finalized system selection with owner approval documentation
- Preliminary load calculations and assumptions
- Equipment space allocations confirmed
- Energy analysis baseline established
- Budget baseline for cost control
Outstanding Issues:
- Items requiring further investigation or analysis
- Coordination challenges identified but not resolved
- Value engineering considerations for DD phase
- Owner decision points that will affect DD work
Design Development Scope:
- More detailed load calculations (room-by-room or zone-by-zone)
- Specific equipment selection with model numbers
- Ductwork and piping sizing calculations
- Detailed control system design
- Refined energy modeling
- Updated cost estimate (±15% accuracy target)
The quality and completeness of schematic design work directly impacts the efficiency of design development and the ultimate success of the constructed system. Thorough analysis, clear documentation, and effective communication during SD phase establish the foundation for project success.
Documentation Standards
Basis of Design Report
The schematic design Basis of Design includes:
Design Criteria:
- Indoor design conditions (temperature, humidity, pressure)
- Outdoor design conditions (summer/winter, coincident wet bulb)
- Ventilation rates by space type
- Filtration requirements (MERV levels)
- Acoustical criteria (NC/RC curves)
System Description:
- Narrative explanation of each HVAC system
- Major equipment list with capacities
- Distribution system overview
- Control system philosophy
- Sequence of operations (preliminary)
Analysis Summary:
- Load calculation methodology and results
- Energy analysis findings
- Life-cycle cost summary
- Code compliance approach
Assumptions and Exclusions:
- Design assumptions requiring verification
- Items excluded from scope
- Allowances (testing, commissioning, controls programming)
- Interfaces with other systems or phases
This document becomes the technical reference for the remainder of the design process and informs construction and commissioning activities.