Submittal Management

Submittal management represents a critical quality control process during construction administration where contractors submit shop drawings, product data, samples, and fabrication details for design team review before procurement and installation. For HVAC systems, submittal review ensures equipment, materials, and installation methods comply with contract documents and design intent.

Submittal Types

Shop Drawings

Shop drawings provide fabricated detail beyond contract documents, showing dimensions, connections, and installation requirements.

HVAC Shop Drawing Content:

• Ductwork fabrication details with gauge thickness, reinforcement locations, and joint types
• Custom air handling unit configurations with component arrangement and access door locations
• Piping fabrication drawings showing hanger spacing, support details, and expansion accommodation
• Control panel layouts with device locations, wiring diagrams, and mounting details
• Equipment pad and curb details with anchor bolt patterns and vibration isolation
• Coordination drawings showing spatial conflicts with structure, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection

Required Shop Drawing Information:

• Compliance with specified standards (SMACNA, ASHRAE, manufacturer requirements)
• Material specifications matching contract requirements
• Fabrication tolerances and quality standards
• Installation instructions and special procedures
• Field assembly details and connection methods
• Testing and inspection requirements

Product Data

Product data submittals provide manufacturer information demonstrating proposed equipment and materials meet specification requirements.

HVAC Product Data Requirements:

• Complete performance data at specified operating conditions (not generic catalog data)
• Dimensional drawings with clearance requirements for maintenance access
• Electrical characteristics including voltage, phase, full load amps, and starter requirements
• Sound data in octave bands at specified operating points
• Weight data for structural coordination
• Materials of construction for all wetted components
• Available factory options and selected configuration
• Installation, operation, and maintenance manuals
• Warranty information and service requirements

Verification Requirements:

• Capacity ratings at project-specific conditions (not ARI standard conditions)
• Performance curves showing operating range and selection point
• Efficiency metrics (EER, SEER, IPLV, kW/ton) meeting minimum requirements
• Certification marks (AHRI, UL, ETL, AMCA) as specified
• Seismic certification data when required
• Energy code compliance documentation

Sample Submittals

Physical samples demonstrate quality, finish, color, texture, and functionality of materials.

HVAC Sample Requirements:

• Diffuser and grille samples showing finish and construction quality
• Insulation samples with vapor barrier and jacketing materials
• Pipe and duct materials showing gauge, coating, and joint types
• Vibration isolation materials demonstrating deflection and load capacity
• Control device samples showing construction and adjustment mechanisms
• Filter media samples demonstrating efficiency rating and construction

Sample Evaluation Criteria:

• Compliance with specified performance characteristics
• Quality of construction and finish
• Durability for intended service life
• Compatibility with adjacent materials
• Aesthetic appearance in visible locations
• Ease of maintenance and replacement

Coordination Drawings

Coordination drawings show spatial integration of all building systems in congested areas.

HVAC Coordination Content:

• Three-dimensional routing of ductwork, piping, and equipment
• Clearances for maintenance access to valves, dampers, and equipment
• Conflict identification and resolution with other trades
• Structural penetration locations and fire-stopping requirements
• Ceiling height verification for concealed installations
• Access panel locations for concealed components

Submittal Schedule

Schedule Development

The contractor develops a submittal schedule identifying all required submittals with submission dates.

Schedule Requirements:

• Submittal number cross-referenced to specification section
• Submittal description identifying specific equipment or material
• Responsibility assignment (mechanical contractor, subcontractor, supplier)
• Planned submission date allowing adequate review time
• Required approval date based on procurement and fabrication lead times
• Critical path items requiring expedited review
• Sequencing based on construction schedule and dependencies

Lead Time Considerations:

• Standard review period: 10-15 business days for initial submittal
• Expedited review: 5-7 business days (requires advance coordination)
• Equipment procurement lead times: 8-20 weeks for major equipment
• Fabrication lead times: 4-12 weeks for custom items
• Resubmittal time: Additional 5-10 days per cycle
• Shop drawing preparation time: 2-6 weeks after contract award

Critical Path Submittals:

• Chillers and boilers requiring long procurement periods
• Custom air handling units with extended fabrication times
• Building automation system with programming requirements
• Major distribution equipment (pumps, cooling towers, air separators)
• Specialty equipment unique to project requirements

Schedule Monitoring

Tracking Requirements:

• Current submittal status (not submitted, under review, approved, rejected)
• Days outstanding for submittals under review
• Resubmittal cycle count and reasons for rejection
• Impact on procurement and construction schedule
• Expedited review requests and justifications

Shop Drawing Review Process

Submission Requirements

Contractor Obligations:

• Review stamp on each submittal indicating contractor verification
• Cover transmittal identifying submittal number, specification section, and description
• Complete manufacturer data with project-specific selections highlighted
• Dimensions verified against contract drawings
• Coordination verified with adjacent work
• Deviations from specifications clearly identified and explained
• Sufficient copies for distribution to design team members

Manufacturer Certification:

• Signed certification that equipment meets specified performance
• Fabrication in accordance with applicable standards
• Factory testing procedures and acceptance criteria
• Quality control procedures during manufacturing

Design Team Review

Review Responsibilities:

Mechanical Engineer:

• Performance verification at specified operating conditions
• Compliance with technical specifications
• Adequacy of structural support and seismic bracing
• Coordination with mechanical system design
• Control sequence verification
• Energy code compliance

Architect:

• Aesthetic appearance of exposed equipment and grilles
• Dimensional coordination with architectural elements
• Access requirements for maintenance
• Impact on ceiling heights and spatial relationships

Structural Engineer:

• Equipment weight verification against design loads
• Vibration isolation adequacy
• Anchor bolt design and placement
• Seismic bracing adequacy

Electrical Engineer:

• Electrical characteristics verification
• Starter and disconnect coordination
• Control wiring compatibility
• Power supply adequacy

Review Response Stamps

Standard Action Stamps:

Approved:

• Submittal complies with contract documents
• No corrections required
• Proceed with procurement and fabrication
• Rare for initial HVAC submittals due to complexity

Approved as Noted:

• Submittal acceptable with minor corrections indicated
• Corrections do not require resubmittal
• Contractor responsible for incorporating noted corrections
• Most common approval status for HVAC submittals

Revise and Resubmit:

• Submittal does not comply with contract requirements
• Significant corrections required
• Resubmittal mandatory before procurement
• Procurement at contractor’s risk if proceeded without approval

Rejected:

• Submittal fundamentally non-compliant with specifications
• Resubmittal required with compliant product
• Procurement prohibited
• May indicate contractor misunderstanding of requirements

Submittal Returned:

• Incomplete information provided
• Contractor review stamp missing
• Insufficient copies submitted
• Does not constitute formal review

Review Comments

Comment Categories:

Performance Issues:

• Capacity inadequate at design conditions
• Efficiency below specified minimum
• Operating range insufficient for system requirements
• Part-load performance inadequate

Construction Issues:

• Access clearances inadequate for maintenance
• Support details inadequate for equipment weight
• Seismic bracing non-compliant with code
• Materials incompatible with specified requirements

Coordination Issues:

• Dimensions conflict with available space
• Connections incompatible with existing systems
• Control interfaces inadequate
• Electrical characteristics require design modification

Documentation Issues:

• Performance data missing for critical parameters
• Installation instructions inadequate
• Operation and maintenance manuals incomplete
• Warranty provisions unclear

Resubmittal Procedures

Resubmittal Requirements

Contractor Responsibilities:

• Address all review comments completely
• Provide point-by-point response to each comment
• Highlight all changes from previous submittal
• Include original submittal with rejection stamp for reference
• Identify any impacts to schedule or cost
• Maintain same submittal number with revision letter

Reasons for Resubmittal:

• Equipment performance inadequate for design requirements
• Substitution proposed without prior approval
• Dimensions incompatible with available space
• Incomplete product data or missing information
• Non-compliance with specified standards
• Inadequate manufacturer certification

Substitution Requests

Substitution Process:

• Submit formal substitution request separate from routine submittals
• Provide detailed comparison of specified versus proposed equipment
• Demonstrate equal or superior performance in all respects
• Include cost impact analysis
• Allow adequate time for thorough evaluation
• Acknowledge potential design modifications required

Evaluation Criteria:

• Performance equivalency at all operating conditions
• Physical dimensions and spatial requirements
• Installation requirements and complexity
• Energy efficiency and operating cost
• Maintenance requirements and service availability
• Warranty provisions
• Impact on construction schedule
• Cost implications

Approval Authority:

• Owner approval required for substitutions affecting performance or cost
• Engineer approval for technical equivalency
• Architect approval for aesthetic impacts
• Burden of proof on contractor to demonstrate equivalency

HVAC-Specific Submittal Requirements

Equipment Submittals

Chillers:

• Capacity at full load and part load (AHRI conditions and project conditions)
• Integrated part load value (IPLV) calculation
• Sound power levels in octave bands
• Compressor type, quantity, staging, and unloading method
• Refrigerant charge and type
• Evaporator and condenser pressure drop
• Water-side fouling factors and flow rates
• Electrical characteristics and starter requirements
• Seismic certification
• Control interface wiring diagrams
• Startup and commissioning requirements

Boilers:

• Input and output capacity ratings
• Combustion efficiency at multiple firing rates
• Thermal efficiency at part load
• Flue gas temperature and composition
• Burner type and turndown ratio
• Combustion air requirements
• Gas train configuration with pressure regulation
• Control sequence and safety interlocks
• Water-side pressure drop
• Expansion tank sizing calculations
• Stack requirements and draft analysis

Air Handling Units:

• Psychrometric analysis showing entering and leaving conditions
• Fan performance curves with operating point plotted
• Coil performance data (capacity, rows, fins per inch, pressure drop)
• Filter section with media type, efficiency, and resistance
• Casing construction meeting specified leakage class
• Access door locations and sizes
• Drain pan construction and connection
• Seismic certification and anchorage details
• Sound power levels at discharge and casing breakout
• Motor efficiency and electrical characteristics
• Control device specifications (dampers, actuators, sensors)

Terminal Units:

• Airflow range and control characteristics
• Sound power levels at minimum and maximum flow
• Leakage classification
• Pressure drop versus airflow curves
• Heating coil performance data
• Primary air inlet connection details
• Control components and wiring diagrams

Distribution System Submittals

Ductwork:

• Fabrication details per SMACNA standards
• Gauge thickness for pressure classification
• Reinforcement spacing and details
• Joint types and sealing methods
• Hanger and support details with spacing
• Fire damper and smoke damper details
• Volume damper and balancing damper construction
• Flexible duct construction and maximum lengths
• Acoustic lining materials and application
• Duct leakage class certification

Piping:

• Pipe material, schedule, and joining method
• Hanger and support details with spacing per MSS SP-69
• Expansion compensation methods and details
• Valve specifications (type, pressure class, materials, operators)
• Insulation materials, thickness, and jacketing
• Pressure testing procedures and acceptance criteria
• Glycol concentration calculations for freeze protection
• Chemical treatment program specifications
• Flow balance valve settings and calculations

Control System Submittals

Building Automation System:

• System architecture diagram showing controllers, networks, and interfaces
• Points list with complete input/output schedule
• Control panel layouts with device mounting
• Wiring diagrams for power and communication
• Control sequences in text and graphic format matching design intent
• Operator interface screen layouts and navigation
• Trending and alarm configuration
• Integration with other systems (lighting, security, fire alarm)
• Network security provisions and user access levels
• Software licensing and revision control

Control Components:

• Sensor specifications (accuracy, range, output signal)
• Actuator specifications (torque, stroke, fail position, speed)
• Valve characteristics (equal percentage, linear, quick opening)
• Damper construction and leakage class
• Transducer specifications (input/output ranges, accuracy)
• Controller specifications (inputs, outputs, processing capability)

Specialty Equipment

Vibration Isolation:

• Deflection calculations at operating weight
• Natural frequency calculations
• Spring type and material
• Seismic restraint details
• Housekeeper pad or inertia base details
• Flexible connector requirements

Sound Attenuators:

• Insertion loss in octave bands
• Pressure drop at design airflow
• Face velocity limitations
• Media type and fire rating
• Casing construction and liner materials
• Drain provisions

Heat Recovery:

• Effectiveness at design conditions
• Pressure drop on both airstreams
• Leakage or carryover between airstreams
• Frost control methods and settings
• Casing construction and access
• Bypass damper configurations

Submittal Log and Tracking

Log Requirements

Information Tracked:

• Submittal number and specification section reference
• Description of equipment or material
• Submittal type (shop drawing, product data, sample)
• Contractor and manufacturer identification
• Date submitted to design team
• Date returned to contractor
• Action taken (approved, approved as noted, revise and resubmit, rejected)
• Number of review cycles
• Status of contractor corrections
• Impact on critical path

Electronic Management Systems:

• Web-based submittal management platforms
• Automated routing to design team members
• Email notifications for submissions and responses
• Document version control
• Searchable archive of all submittals
• Status reporting and dashboard views
• Integration with project management software

Common Submittal Deficiencies

Incomplete Information

Frequent Omissions:

• Performance data at non-standard operating conditions
• Sound data for acoustically sensitive locations
• Electrical characteristics for power coordination
• Dimensional data for spatial coordination
• Installation requirements for structural coordination
• Operation and maintenance manual information
• Warranty terms and conditions

Non-Compliant Selections

Common Issues:

• Equipment undersized for design loads
• Efficiency below specified minimum
• Materials incompatible with specified media
• Construction quality below specified standards
• Missing specified features or options
• Inadequate operating range for system requirements

Inadequate Contractor Review

Review Failures:

• No verification of dimensional coordination
• Conflicts with contract documents not identified
• Deviations from specifications not highlighted
• Incomplete manufacturer data not supplemented
• Missing contractor review stamp
• Generic catalog data rather than project-specific selections

Submittal Review Best Practices

For Contractors

Preparation:

• Review specifications thoroughly before preparing submittals
• Verify equipment selections using manufacturer software
• Check dimensional coordination with available space
• Highlight specified features on product data
• Identify any deviations with explanation and justification
• Provide complete information in initial submittal
• Allow adequate time for proper review (avoid expedite requests)

Quality Control:

• Independent review by project engineer before submission
• Verification of performance at project conditions
• Cross-check with other trade submittals
• Completeness check against specification requirements
• Manufacturer certification obtained
• Schedule impact analyzed

For Design Teams

Review Process:

• Establish clear review procedures and responsibilities
• Maintain consistent review standards across projects
• Focus on compliance with performance requirements
• Identify cost or schedule impacts of deficiencies
• Provide clear, specific comments
• Return submittals promptly within scheduled review period
• Coordinate review comments among disciplines

Documentation:

• Maintain complete submittal file including all revisions
• Document verbal discussions regarding submittals
• Track commitments for future submittals
• Note deviations approved during review
• Archive final approved submittals as contract documents

The submittal management process ensures HVAC systems are constructed per design intent with equipment and materials meeting specified performance, quality, and compatibility requirements. Effective submittal management prevents installation of non-compliant equipment, reduces construction delays, and establishes documentation for operations, maintenance, and warranty administration.

Sections