Project Delivery Methods

Project delivery methods define the contractual relationships, risk allocation, communication pathways, and collaboration frameworks that govern how HVAC systems are designed, procured, constructed, and commissioned. The selection of an appropriate delivery method significantly impacts project outcomes including cost control, schedule performance, design quality, constructability, and system performance.

Delivery Method Fundamentals

Contractual Structure

Project delivery methods establish the legal and organizational framework for project execution:

Primary Contract Relationships:

• Owner-designer contract defines design scope, professional liability, and deliverables
• Owner-contractor contract establishes construction obligations, warranty, and payment terms
• Designer-contractor relationship varies by delivery method (adversarial to collaborative)
• Subcontractor agreements cascade obligations and coordinate specialty trades

Risk Allocation Principles:

• Design risk: liability for errors, omissions, and performance specifications
• Construction risk: means, methods, sequencing, and site conditions
• Cost risk: budget overruns, contingency management, and change order exposure
• Schedule risk: delay impacts, critical path management, and weather contingencies
• Performance risk: system operation, energy targets, and warranty obligations

Communication Pathways

Delivery methods dictate information flow and decision-making authority:

Traditional Hierarchical Model:

• Owner issues directives through designer to contractor
• Contractor submits questions through RFI process to designer
• Designer reviews shop drawings and responds with formal approval
• Limited direct communication between design and construction teams

Integrated Communication Model:

• Co-location of project team members in shared workspace
• Direct communication channels across all stakeholders
• Collaborative decision-making with immediate feedback loops
• Technology-enabled information sharing and real-time coordination

Design-Bid-Build (DBB)

Design-bid-build represents the traditional sequential approach to project delivery with clear separation between design and construction phases.

Process Sequence

Phase 1 - Design Development:

• Owner retains designer under professional services agreement
• Designer develops complete construction documents (100% CD)
• HVAC engineer produces specifications, drawings, and equipment schedules
• Design completion occurs before contractor involvement
• Typical duration: 6-12 months for HVAC design depending on complexity

Phase 2 - Competitive Bidding:

• Complete construction documents issued for bidding
• General contractors solicit HVAC subcontractor pricing
• Sealed bids submitted with lump sum or unit price structure
• Owner awards contract to lowest responsive, responsible bidder
• Typical duration: 4-8 weeks for bid and award

Phase 3 - Construction Execution:

• Contractor assumes responsibility for means and methods
• Shop drawing submittal and approval process
• Construction progresses with designer providing contract administration
• Change orders processed for unforeseen conditions or owner changes
• Typical duration: 12-24 months depending on project scale

HVAC-Specific Advantages

Design Optimization:

• Complete system analysis and load calculations without schedule pressure
• Comprehensive energy modeling and lifecycle cost evaluation
• Detailed coordination with architectural and structural elements
• Thorough specification development with performance criteria
• Multiple design iterations to optimize duct routing and equipment placement

Competitive Pricing:

• Multiple HVAC subcontractors bidding on identical scope
• Market-driven equipment and labor pricing
• Substitution opportunities identified during bidding
• Value engineering proposals solicited from contractors
• Fair comparison of proposed systems and approaches

Clear Accountability:

• Designer responsible for design adequacy and performance specifications
• Contractor responsible for installation quality and workmanship
• Separation of design and construction reduces conflict of interest
• Well-established precedent for dispute resolution

HVAC-Specific Challenges

Constructability Issues:

• Limited contractor input during design development
• Potential for unbuildable duct layouts or inaccessible equipment
• Shop drawing process reveals coordination conflicts late in schedule
• Equipment selections may not reflect current market availability
• Duct sizing may not account for actual fittings and transitions

Change Order Exposure:

• Unforeseen site conditions discovered during construction
• Coordination conflicts between trades require design modifications
• Owner changes to program trigger cascading HVAC impacts
• Equipment substitutions necessitate engineering redesign
• Differing site conditions clause creates cost uncertainty

Innovation Limitations:

• Prescriptive specifications limit contractor creativity
• Proprietary equipment selections reduce competition
• Alternative system approaches difficult to propose after bidding
• Value engineering often focused on cost reduction rather than optimization
• Limited opportunity for performance-based specifications

Appropriate Applications

Design-bid-build works best when:

• Public sector projects require competitive bidding by statute
• Project scope is well-defined with minimal anticipated changes
• Owner has experienced staff to manage designer and contractor separately
• Schedule permits sequential design-then-construct approach
• HVAC system is conventional with established design criteria
• Fair and open competition is priority over speed or collaboration

Design-Build (DB)

Design-build consolidates design and construction responsibility under a single contract, creating a unified project team accountable for both design performance and construction quality.

Organizational Structure

Single Point of Responsibility:

• Owner contracts with design-build entity for complete project delivery
• Design-build firm either employs designers or retains them as consultants
• HVAC engineer works directly for or with design-build contractor
• Mechanical subcontractor often integrated into design-build team
• Owner interfaces with single entity rather than separate designer and builder

Team Formation Approaches:

• Contractor-led: general contractor retains design professionals
• Designer-led: architecture/engineering firm partners with contractor
• Joint venture: designer and contractor form partnership entity
• Integrated firm: company maintains in-house design and construction capability

Delivery Process

Phase 1 - Procurement and Preliminary Design:

• Owner develops bridging documents or performance specifications
• Design-build teams submit qualifications and proposed approach
• Selection based on qualifications, price, or best-value criteria
• Preliminary HVAC design developed to support proposal pricing
• Duration: 8-16 weeks for procurement

Phase 2 - Design Development:

• Design-build team refines design with constructor input
• Value engineering integrated throughout design process
• HVAC system selection optimized for cost and constructability
• Early equipment procurement for long-lead items
• Overlapping design and construction activities
• Duration: 3-6 months with concurrent construction mobilization

Phase 3 - Construction Execution:

• Construction begins before design completion (fast-track)
• Continuous design refinement based on construction feedback
• Integrated shop drawing and fabrication process
• Single-source accountability for performance and cost
• Duration: 10-20 months with overlapping design activities

HVAC-Specific Advantages

Early Contractor Input:

• HVAC subcontractor involved during design development
• Constructability review identifies potential installation challenges
• Equipment selection based on current availability and lead times
• Duct layout optimized for fabrication efficiency
• Access requirements incorporated during initial design

Cost Certainty:

• Guaranteed maximum price (GMP) established early in process
• HVAC budget refined with contractor pricing knowledge
• Equipment selections based on firm quotations
• Savings sharing provisions incentivize cost management
• Reduced change order exposure through integrated team

Schedule Compression:

• Fast-track sequencing overlaps design and construction
• Long-lead HVAC equipment ordered during design phase
• Ductwork fabrication begins while final drawings completed
• Testing and commissioning activities planned from project outset
• Substantial completion achieved 20-30% faster than DBB

Innovation Opportunities:

• Performance-based specifications encourage creative solutions
• Alternative HVAC system proposals evaluated during design
• Value engineering naturally integrated rather than adversarial
• Proprietary systems and technologies more easily incorporated
• Energy efficiency innovations with favorable lifecycle economics

HVAC-Specific Challenges

Design Quality Concerns:

• Cost and schedule pressures may compromise design thoroughness
• Reduced design iterations and optimization opportunities
• HVAC engineer works for contractor creating potential conflict
• Owner loses independent designer advocate for system performance
• Value engineering may prioritize first cost over lifecycle value

Limited Competition:

• Single HVAC subcontractor rather than competitive bidding
• Equipment selections may favor contractor relationships over best value
• Reduced price transparency for owner
• Substitution opportunities limited by integrated team structure

Owner Oversight Requirements:

• Owner needs sophisticated staff or advisor to evaluate design-build proposals
• Performance specifications must clearly define HVAC requirements
• Quality assurance requires third-party review and commissioning
• Reduced checks and balances necessitate enhanced owner vigilance

Appropriate Applications

Design-build is preferred when:

• Schedule acceleration is critical business driver
• Project scope permits performance-based specifications
• Owner has clear criteria but flexible approach to solutions
• HVAC system complexity benefits from early contractor input
• Risk transfer to single entity aligns with owner objectives
• Innovation and lifecycle value prioritized over first cost competition

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)

CMAR provides collaborative team structure while maintaining separate designer contracts, with the CM assuming contractor role during construction phase.

Dual-Phase Contract Structure

Phase 1 - Preconstruction Services:

• Owner retains CM under professional services fee agreement
• CM provides cost estimating, scheduling, and constructability review
• HVAC subcontractors engaged for budget pricing and design input
• CM advises owner and designer but has no construction authority
• Fee-based compensation for preconstruction services

Phase 2 - Construction Services:

• Contract converts to guaranteed maximum price (GMP) for construction
• CM assumes general contractor responsibilities and risks
• HVAC scope either competitively bid or negotiated with selected firms
• CM accountable for cost, schedule, and quality performance
• At-risk compensation tied to project outcomes

Process Flow

Early Involvement (Schematic Design):

• CM joins project team during conceptual design phase
• Preliminary HVAC system options evaluated for cost and feasibility
• Budget estimates refined using actual subcontractor feedback
• Schedule development identifies long-lead HVAC equipment items
• Duration: concurrent with design, 2-4 months

Design Development:

• CM provides ongoing cost estimates at 30%, 60%, 90% design milestones
• HVAC subcontractors review drawings for constructability
• Value engineering proposals evaluated collaboratively
• Phasing and logistics plans accommodate site constraints
• Duration: concurrent with design, 4-8 months

GMP Establishment:

• Detailed quantity takeoff and subcontractor pricing at 90-100% CD
• HVAC scope packaged for bidding or negotiation
• Contingency and fee structure negotiated with owner
• Contract converts from fee-based to at-risk GMP
• Duration: 4-6 weeks at design completion

Construction Execution:

• CM self-performs or subcontracts work packages
• HVAC installation proceeds under CM coordination
• Shop drawings and submittals reviewed by designer
• Commissioning integrated throughout construction
• Duration: 12-20 months typical

HVAC-Specific Advantages

Collaborative Design Process:

• HVAC subcontractor input during design without single-source commitment
• Multiple subcontractors can provide preconstruction input
• Designer maintains independence while receiving constructor feedback
• Equipment selections validated against current market pricing
• Duct routing reviewed for installation efficiency before finalization

Cost Control:

• Continuous budget validation throughout design process
• HVAC value engineering identified early when changes are economical
• GMP provides cost certainty while maintaining design quality
• Savings sharing provisions align CM and owner interests
• Reduced contingency through proactive risk management

Schedule Management:

• Early procurement of long-lead HVAC equipment
• Phased construction can begin before full design completion
• Critical path activities identified and managed proactively
• Testing and commissioning planned from project outset

Risk Allocation:

• Designer maintains professional liability for design adequacy
• CM assumes construction risk after GMP agreement
• Owner retains control over key HVAC design decisions
• Transparent cost tracking and open-book accounting

HVAC-Specific Challenges

GMP Negotiation Complexity:

• Tension between collaborative relationship and price negotiation
• HVAC scope definition at GMP may lack full detail
• Contingency allocation becomes contentious issue
• Owner loses competitive bidding leverage for mechanical trades

Preconstruction Compensation:

• Additional cost for CM services during design phase
• HVAC subcontractor preconstruction input may require compensation
• Risk that CM preconstruction investment doesn’t lead to construction contract

Subcontractor Selection:

• Balance between competitive bidding and collaborative relationships
• HVAC firms providing preconstruction input expect construction award
• Qualification-based selection may result in higher pricing than DBB

Appropriate Applications

CMAR is optimal when:

• Owner wants collaborative approach with independent designer
• Complex HVAC systems benefit from early constructor input
• Schedule requires some fast-tracking but design quality is priority
• Public sector owners need transparency and fair competition
• Cost certainty desired before full design completion
• Project complexity justifies preconstruction investment

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)

IPD represents the most collaborative delivery method, using multi-party agreements and shared risk/reward to align all stakeholders around project success.

Foundational Principles

Shared Risk and Reward:

• Owner, designer, and key contractors sign multi-party agreement
• Profit pools distributed based on project performance metrics
• Cost savings and overruns shared among IPD team members
• Performance incentives for energy efficiency, schedule, and quality outcomes
• HVAC subcontractor included as IPD member for major projects

Early Involvement of Key Participants:

• HVAC contractor and engineer engaged during conceptual design
• Major equipment suppliers participate in design decisions
• Controls contractor integrated from design inception
• Commissioning authority involved from project outset
• Testing agency contributes to specification development

Collaborative Decision-Making:

• Consensus-based decisions replace hierarchical approval process
• Big Room sessions bring entire team together for coordination
• Lean construction principles applied throughout project
• Last Responsible Moment decision-making preserves design flexibility
• Target Value Design drives continuous cost optimization

Building Information Modeling (BIM):

• Fully integrated 3D model shared across all disciplines
• HVAC systems modeled in detail for coordination and fabrication
• Clash detection occurs in virtual environment before construction
• Model-based quantity takeoffs and cost estimating
• As-built model delivered for facility management

Contract Structure

Multi-Party Agreement:

• Single contract binds owner, designer, general contractor, and key trades
• HVAC contractor typically signatory party for mechanical scope
• Shared legal liability reduces adversarial relationships
• Waiver of claims provisions between IPD parties
• Insurance structured for team rather than individual entities

Compensation Models:

• Cost of work reimbursed at actual cost plus fee
• Profit/overhead placed in at-risk pool
• Target cost established collaboratively
• Performance metrics determine profit distribution
• Pain/gain sharing for cost variance from target

Implementation Process

Conceptual Design (Validation Phase):

• IPD team assembled and multi-party agreement executed
• HVAC system alternatives evaluated collaboratively
• Target cost established using team input
• Preliminary energy models validate system approach
• Duration: 2-4 months

Detailed Design (Design Phase):

• Co-located team develops integrated design solution
• HVAC duct routing coordinated in real-time with other trades
• Equipment selections based on lifecycle cost analysis
• Set-based design evaluates multiple options before converging
• Continuous cost estimating validates target value alignment
• Duration: 4-8 months with overlapping construction

Construction (Implementation Phase):

• Prefabrication maximized through early design freeze of HVAC systems
• Pull planning sessions optimize construction sequencing
• Lean construction techniques minimize waste
• Continuous commissioning validates performance
• Duration: 10-18 months with fast-track sequencing

Closeout (Handover Phase):

• Comprehensive systems training for facility staff
• BIM model transitioned to facility management system
• Performance validation against design intent
• Post-occupancy evaluation informs future projects

HVAC-Specific Advantages

Optimal System Design:

• HVAC contractor expertise applied during conceptual design
• Equipment selections optimized for performance and maintainability
• Duct systems designed for efficient fabrication and installation
• Controls integration planned from design inception
• Lifecycle cost analysis drives decision-making

Enhanced Coordination:

• Real-time clash detection eliminates most field conflicts
• HVAC systems coordinated with structure, architecture, and other MEP
• Access and maintenance requirements incorporated during design
• Prefabrication opportunities maximized through early coordination

Performance Assurance:

• Commissioning integrated throughout design and construction
• Performance targets drive collaborative problem-solving
• Energy modeling refined with actual equipment selections
• Post-occupancy performance validation included in delivery

Innovation and Efficiency:

• Team incentivized to find better solutions rather than protect positions
• Alternative HVAC technologies evaluated fairly
• Waste elimination benefits all team members
• Lessons learned captured and applied during project

HVAC-Specific Challenges

Cultural Change Requirements:

• HVAC firms must adapt from adversarial to collaborative mindset
• Open-book accounting reveals cost structure to owner and competitors
• Shared risk requires sophisticated business management
• Long-term relationship commitment before full scope definition

Contract Complexity:

• Multi-party agreements require specialized legal expertise
• Insurance and bonding may be challenging to obtain
• Risk allocation and profit distribution formulas complex
• Limited precedent for dispute resolution within IPD structure

Selection and Compensation:

• Qualification-based selection of HVAC contractor before competitive pricing
• Preconstruction investment significant before guaranteed compensation
• Profit at risk requires confidence in team performance
• Fee structures unfamiliar to traditional HVAC subcontractors

Appropriate Applications

IPD is most effective when:

• Owner committed to collaborative culture and willing to share risk
• Complex HVAC systems require extensive coordination
• Performance outcomes (energy, indoor air quality) are critical drivers
• Project scale justifies investment in IPD processes and technology
• Team members have prior IPD or collaborative delivery experience
• Schedule and budget permit early involvement of key trades

Delivery Method Selection Criteria

Project Characteristics

Complexity Considerations:

• Simple, repetitive HVAC systems: DBB competitive approach appropriate
• Complex custom systems: DB or CMAR benefits from constructor input
• High-performance buildings: IPD aligns team around performance goals
• Renovation/retrofit: CMAR or DB addresses unknown conditions
• Mission-critical facilities: IPD or CMAR for enhanced coordination

Schedule Requirements:

• Conventional timeline: DBB sequential approach acceptable
• Fast-track necessity: DB or CMAR enables overlapping activities
• Extremely aggressive schedule: IPD maximizes collaboration and efficiency
• Flexible completion: DBB provides thorough design before commitment
• Phased occupancy: CMAR or DB manages multiple substantial completions

Budget Constraints:

• Fixed budget with flexibility on approach: DB transfers cost risk
• Need for competitive pricing: DBB or CMAR with competitive bidding
• Lifecycle cost priority: IPD aligns incentives for optimal solutions
• Cost uncertainty: CMAR provides progressive budget validation
• Value engineering important: DB or IPD integrates VE naturally

Owner Capabilities

In-House Expertise:

• Sophisticated facilities team: any delivery method viable
• Limited technical staff: DB single point of responsibility beneficial
• Experienced construction management: CMAR leverages owner capability
• Need for designer advocate: DBB maintains independent design professional
• Collaborative culture: IPD extends owner’s collaborative approach

Risk Tolerance:

• Risk-averse owner: DBB or CMAR maintains traditional protections
• Willing to share risk for better outcomes: IPD aligns incentives
• Transfer maximum risk: DB single-source accountability
• Retain design control: DBB or CMAR keeps designer accountable to owner
• Accept cost uncertainty for schedule: DB or IPD fast-track approach

Procurement Authority:

• Public sector competitive bidding requirements: DBB or qualified DB
• Private sector flexibility: full range of delivery methods available
• Progressive design-build statutes: CMAR-like DB procurement
• Best-value selection authority: DB or IPD qualification-based selection
• Low-bid mandate: DBB traditional competitive approach

HVAC System Factors

Technology and Innovation:

• Conventional systems: DBB competitive approach efficient
• Emerging technologies: DB or IPD encourages innovation
• Proprietary systems: DB accommodates single-source solutions
• Performance-based specifications: DB or IPD outcome-focused
• Equipment standardization: DBB ensures exact specifications

Performance Criticality:

• Standard comfort conditioning: DBB provides adequate quality assurance
• Healthcare/laboratory HVAC: CMAR or IPD for enhanced coordination
• Data center cooling: IPD aligns team around reliability and efficiency
• Industrial process systems: DB or CMAR for specialized expertise
• High-performance buildings: IPD integrates performance goals

Coordination Requirements:

• Simple duct distribution: DBB sequential coordination acceptable
• Complex air handling systems: CMAR provides preconstruction coordination
• Integrated building systems: IPD real-time coordination optimal
• Multiple mechanical systems: DB or CMAR for unified approach
• Prefabrication opportunities: IPD or DB maximizes off-site fabrication

Team Roles and Responsibilities

Design-Bid-Build Roles

HVAC Design Engineer:

• Complete system design and construction documents
• Performance specifications and equipment schedules
• Shop drawing review and submittal approval
• RFI responses and change order evaluation
• Construction administration and site observation
• Commissioning support and performance verification

Mechanical Contractor:

• Competitive bid preparation and value engineering proposals
• Equipment procurement and submittal preparation
• Installation per plans and specifications
• Quality control and self-performed testing
• Warranty and startup services
• Coordination with other trades through general contractor

General Contractor:

• Overall project coordination and schedule management
• Mechanical scope buyout and subcontract administration
• Progress payment processing and cost control
• Site logistics and safety management
• Submittal routing between subs and designer
• Closeout and warranty coordination

Owner’s Representative:

• Contract administration with designer and contractor
• Budget and schedule monitoring
• Design review and approval authority
• Change order evaluation and approval
• Quality assurance and site observation
• Commissioning coordination and acceptance

Design-Build Roles

Design-Build Entity:

• Single-source responsibility for design and construction
• Integrated team management and coordination
• Budget and schedule accountability
• Performance guarantee and warranty
• Design professional services (in-house or retained)
• Construction execution and quality management

HVAC Design Engineer (DB Team Member):

• System design integrated with construction capabilities
• Equipment selection optimized for cost and availability
• Design coordination with installing contractor
• Performance specification development
• Shop drawing review streamlined within team
• Commissioning support and performance validation

Mechanical Contractor (DB Team Member):

• Preconstruction cost estimating and scheduling
• Constructability review during design development
• Equipment procurement and value engineering
• Installation and quality control
• Testing and commissioning execution
• Warranty and operational training

Owner’s Advisor (Independent):

• Design-build proposal evaluation and selection support
• Performance specification development
• Independent design quality review
• Third-party commissioning services
• Budget and schedule monitoring
• Performance acceptance testing

CMAR Roles

Construction Manager:

• Preconstruction cost estimating and constructability review
• HVAC subcontractor engagement for design input
• Schedule development and long-lead procurement planning
• Value engineering facilitation
• GMP development and negotiation
• At-risk construction execution and coordination

HVAC Design Engineer:

• Complete system design with CM input
• Design development cost reconciliation
• Constructability review collaboration
• Traditional shop drawing review and approval
• Construction administration and field observation
• Commissioning design and specification

HVAC Subcontractor:

• Preconstruction estimating and design input
• Competitive or negotiated pricing for GMP
• Equipment procurement and installation
• Shop drawing preparation and coordination
• Quality control and testing
• Warranty and training services

Owner:

• Active participation in design decisions
• Budget approval at design milestones
• GMP negotiation and approval
• Design and construction oversight
• Change order evaluation and approval
• Commissioning coordination and acceptance

IPD Roles

IPD Core Team (Owner, Designer, Builder, Key Trades):

• Collaborative decision-making and problem-solving
• Shared risk and reward accountability
• Co-location and continuous coordination
• BIM model development and management
• Target Value Design implementation
• Lean construction principles application

HVAC Contractor (IPD Member):

• Early involvement in conceptual design
• System selection and optimization
• Cost and schedule input throughout design
• BIM coordination in real-time
• Prefabrication planning and execution
• Installation and commissioning integration
• Shared accountability for project outcomes

HVAC Design Engineer (IPD Member):

• Collaborative design with installing contractor
• Performance-based specifications
• Integrated BIM modeling
• Lifecycle cost analysis
• Continuous cost and constructability review
• Commissioning design and support
• Post-occupancy performance validation

Commissioning Authority (IPD Member):

• Design phase commissioning planning
• Performance specification review
• Construction phase testing and verification
• Systems integration and optimization
• Functional performance testing
• Post-occupancy monitoring and support

Emerging Delivery Trends

Progressive Design-Build

Combines CMAR preconstruction collaboration with DB single-source delivery:

• Two-phase procurement: qualifications-based selection followed by progressive GMP
• Collaborative design development with constructor input
• Design refinement based on actual costs rather than estimates
• Conversion to single-source DB contract after design validation
• Maintains competition while enabling collaboration

Alliance Contracting

Multi-party agreement with pure cost reimbursement and shared outcomes:

• All parties compensated at cost with no markup
• Profit pool distributed based on performance against targets
• Unanimous decision-making for major decisions
• No-blame culture with focus on problem-solving
• Rare in US but growing internationally

Public-Private Partnerships (P3)

Private sector designs, builds, finances, operates, and maintains public facilities:

• Long-term performance responsibility (20-30 years) drives quality design
• HVAC system lifecycle cost and energy efficiency critical to P3 economics
• Operations and maintenance considerations integrated from design
• Performance-based payments incentivize system reliability
• Risk transfer to private sector for design, construction, and operations

Conclusion

The selection of project delivery method fundamentally shapes HVAC project outcomes. Design-bid-build provides competitive pricing and clear accountability through sequential execution. Design-build offers schedule acceleration and single-source responsibility through integrated teams. Construction manager at risk combines collaborative preconstruction with competitive pricing and cost certainty. Integrated project delivery aligns all stakeholders through shared risk and reward for optimal performance.

Successful HVAC professionals must understand the opportunities and constraints of each delivery method, adapting technical approach, communication style, and risk management strategies to the contractual framework. As the industry evolves toward more collaborative and performance-oriented delivery methods, the ability to work effectively across delivery models becomes an essential competency for engineers, contractors, and owners alike.

The trend toward early contractor involvement, integrated teams, and performance-based compensation reflects the increasing complexity of HVAC systems and the growing importance of energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, and lifecycle value. While traditional design-bid-build retains relevance for straightforward projects with well-defined scopes, the most challenging and innovative HVAC projects increasingly benefit from collaborative delivery methods that harness the expertise of all stakeholders from project conception through operational performance validation.

Sections