Foam Boards

Foam board insulation materials provide rigid thermal barriers with high R-value per inch ratios critical for HVAC ductwork, piping systems, and equipment enclosures. Three primary foam board types dominate mechanical system applications: expanded polystyrene (EPS), extruded polystyrene (XPS), and polyisocyanurate (polyiso), each exhibiting distinct thermal, physical, and chemical properties affecting system performance.

Foam Board Types and Cellular Structure

Expanded Polystyrene (EPS)

EPS consists of fused polystyrene beads creating an open-cell structure with visible spherical geometry. Manufacturing processes expand pentane-impregnated polystyrene beads using steam heat, producing densities ranging from 0.90 to 2.85 lb/ft³. The bead-fusion method creates interconnected air voids representing 95-98% of total volume.

Structural characteristics:

• Cell diameter: 0.2-0.5 mm
• Bead fusion bond strength: 15-25 psi
• Open-cell percentage: 10-15% (partially open)
• Air permeability: 0.2-0.5 L/(s·m²) at 75 Pa

Extruded Polystyrene (XPS)

XPS production employs continuous extrusion processes combining polystyrene resin with blowing agents under controlled temperature and pressure conditions. The resulting closed-cell structure exhibits uniform cell distribution with cell sizes of 0.1-0.2 mm. Blowing agents historically included HCFC-142b, transitioning to HFC-134a, and currently adopting HFO-1234ze with lower global warming potential.

Structural characteristics:

• Cell uniformity: >95% closed-cell structure
• Cell size: 0.1-0.2 mm diameter
• Density range: 1.3-3.0 lb/ft³
• Compressive strength: 15-60 psi at 10% deformation

Polyisocyanurate (Polyiso)

Polyiso boards result from chemical reactions between isocyanate and polyol components catalyzed under controlled conditions. The rigid foam contains predominantly closed cells (>90%) with cell diameters of 0.05-0.15 mm. Foaming agents currently employ pentane or water-blown processes, with pentane-blown products exhibiting higher initial R-values.

Structural characteristics:

• Closed-cell content: >90%
• Density: 1.8-3.0 lb/ft³
• Compressive strength: 16-25 psi (unfaced)
• Dimensional stability: ±2% maximum variation

Thermal Performance Properties

R-Values and Temperature Dependence

Thermal resistance values for foam boards vary with temperature, thickness, aging effects, and facing materials. R-values represent steady-state conditions measured at 75°F mean temperature per ASTM C518.

Thermal drift occurs in XPS and polyiso as blowing agents diffuse from cells and air infiltrates, reducing long-term thermal performance by 8-15%. EPS demonstrates stable R-values because air serves as the primary insulating medium within cells.

Temperature-Dependent Conductivity

Thermal conductivity increases with temperature following approximately linear relationships for operating ranges encountered in HVAC applications.

EPS thermal conductivity variation:

• At -20°F: k = 0.26 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)
• At 75°F: k = 0.28 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)
• At 150°F: k = 0.32 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)

XPS thermal conductivity variation:

• At -20°F: k = 0.19 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)
• At 75°F: k = 0.21 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)
• At 150°F: k = 0.25 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)

Polyiso thermal conductivity variation:

• At -20°F: k = 0.28 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)
• At 75°F: k = 0.16 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)
• At 150°F: k = 0.19 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F)

Polyiso exhibits significant thermal performance degradation below 40°F, with R-values declining 20-30% at temperatures below 0°F. This temperature sensitivity limits polyiso applications for exterior ductwork and piping systems in cold climates.

Moisture Resistance Properties

Water Vapor Permeability

Water vapor transmission rates determine suitability for applications involving temperature differentials and humidity exposure.

Foil facings on polyiso boards reduce vapor permeance by 98-99%, creating effective vapor retarders meeting Class I requirements (<0.1 perm). XPS exhibits the lowest permeance among unfaced foam boards due to its uniform closed-cell structure.

Water Absorption and Capillary Action

Moisture absorption under immersion or high humidity conditions affects thermal performance and dimensional stability.

ASTM C272 immersion test results (24-hour):

• EPS (1.5 lb/ft³): 2-4% by volume
• XPS: 0.1-0.3% by volume
• Polyiso (unfaced): 1-2% by volume

EPS demonstrates higher water absorption due to partially open-cell structure allowing capillary action between fused beads. XPS provides superior moisture resistance for below-grade applications and direct earth contact. Polyiso water absorption occurs primarily at cut edges and through facer penetrations.

Freeze-Thaw Resistance

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles test structural integrity for exterior applications experiencing cyclic temperature swings across freezing points.

ASTM C666 freeze-thaw cycling (300 cycles):

• EPS: <5% strength reduction
• XPS: <3% strength reduction
• Polyiso: 5-10% strength reduction

EPS and XPS maintain dimensional stability and compressive strength through freeze-thaw cycling. Polyiso shows greater susceptibility to degradation when moisture is present during freezing, potentially causing cell wall damage and R-value loss.

Fire Performance Characteristics

Flame Spread and Smoke Development

Fire testing per ASTM E84 (Steiner Tunnel Test) establishes flame spread index (FSI) and smoke developed index (SDI) ratings governing building code compliance.

Polyiso with aluminum foil facings achieves Class A ratings (FSI <25, SDI <50) due to non-combustible facers and char-forming properties of polyisocyanurate chemistry. EPS and XPS require fire-retardant additives (typically hexabromocyclododecane or polymeric brominated compounds) to achieve acceptable flame spread ratings.

Ignition Temperature and Combustion

Thermal decomposition temperatures define operational temperature limits and fire exposure behavior.

Ignition characteristics:

• EPS: Ignition temperature 600-680°F, melts at 200-240°F
• XPS: Ignition temperature 640-700°F, melts at 165-185°F
• Polyiso: Ignition temperature 800-850°F, chars above 400°F

All foam plastics require thermal barriers (typically 0.5-inch gypsum board or equivalent 15-minute thermal barrier) for building interior applications per IBC Section 2603. Polyiso produces less smoke and toxic gas emissions during combustion compared to polystyrene foams.

Oxygen Index and Combustibility

The limiting oxygen index (LOI) indicates minimum oxygen concentration supporting combustion.

• EPS (non-fire-retardant): LOI = 18% (readily combustible)
• EPS (fire-retardant): LOI = 24-28%
• XPS (fire-retardant): LOI = 24-26%
• Polyiso: LOI = 23-26%

Materials with LOI >21% resist ignition in normal atmospheric conditions (21% oxygen). Fire-retardant additives increase LOI by interfering with radical chain reactions during polymer combustion.

Physical and Mechanical Properties

Compressive Strength

Compressive strength measured per ASTM D1621 at 10% deformation determines load-bearing capacity for applications involving mechanical loads.

Higher density formulations provide increased load-bearing capacity for applications such as exterior duct supports, roof-mounted equipment pads, and mechanical room floor insulation.

Dimensional Stability

Thermal expansion coefficients determine dimensional changes across service temperature ranges.

Linear thermal expansion coefficients:

• EPS: 35 × 10⁻⁶ in/(in·°F)
• XPS: 35 × 10⁻⁶ in/(in·°F)
• Polyiso: 30 × 10⁻⁶ in/(in·°F)

A 4-foot foam board experiencing 100°F temperature change expands approximately 0.17 inches. Expansion joints and flexible connections accommodate dimensional changes in large surface area applications.

Tensile and Flexural Strength

Tensile strength perpendicular to surface (ASTM D1623) and flexural strength (ASTM C203) determine resistance to mechanical damage during installation and service.

Typical values:

• EPS (1.5 lb/ft³): Tensile strength 18-25 psi, flexural strength 35-50 psi
• XPS (1.5 lb/ft³): Tensile strength 25-40 psi, flexural strength 50-75 psi
• Polyiso (2.0 lb/ft³): Tensile strength 20-35 psi, flexural strength 40-60 psi

Chemical Resistance and Compatibility

Solvent Sensitivity

Organic solvents and petroleum products attack foam plastic cellular structures, causing dissolution or severe degradation.

Materials causing damage to EPS and XPS:

• Aliphatic hydrocarbons (gasoline, kerosene, mineral spirits)
• Aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, xylene)
• Chlorinated solvents (methylene chloride, trichloroethylene)
• Ketones (acetone, MEK)
• Esters (ethyl acetate)

Polyiso demonstrates slightly better solvent resistance than polystyrene foams but still degrades upon contact with strong solvents. Protective barriers (coatings, facers, physical separation) prevent direct contact between foam boards and incompatible chemicals.

Compatible Materials

Materials safe for direct contact:

• Portland cement and cement-based materials
• Gypsum and gypsum-based products
• Lime and lime-based mortars
• Acrylic and latex-based mastics and adhesives
• Water-based coatings and sealants
• Polyethylene films and vapor retarders

Compatibility testing per ASTM C1338 verifies material interactions for specific product combinations prior to field application.

HVAC Application Considerations

Ductwork Insulation

Foam boards serve as exterior duct insulation for rectangular sheet metal ductwork in mechanical rooms and exposed locations.

Application parameters:

• Standard thickness: 1-2 inches (R-4 to R-12)
• Attachment: Mechanical fasteners with large washers, adhesive systems
• Facing requirements: FSK (foil-scrim-kraft) facing for vapor control
• Joint sealing: Aluminum foil tape or mastic at board edges

Temperature limitations restrict material selection:

• EPS: Maximum 165°F continuous exposure
• XPS: Maximum 165°F continuous exposure
• Polyiso: Maximum 250°F continuous exposure

Polyiso provides advantages for high-temperature applications including boiler breechings, exhaust ductwork, and heat recovery equipment.

Piping Insulation

Pre-fabricated pipe sections and flat boards cut to size insulate refrigerant lines, chilled water piping, and condensate piping.

Selection criteria:

• Closed-cell structure preferred (XPS, polyiso) for chilled water applications
• Minimum R-5 to R-8 for refrigerant suction lines
• Vapor retarder jacketing mandatory for below-ambient temperature piping
• Joint sealing eliminates thermal bridges and moisture infiltration

XPS and foil-faced polyiso provide optimal moisture resistance for below-ambient piping insulation, minimizing condensation risk on cold surfaces.

Equipment Enclosures

Foam board construction creates insulated enclosures for outdoor mechanical equipment including condensing units, heat pumps, and air handling units.

Design considerations:

• Minimum R-10 to R-15 insulation value
• Weatherproof exterior facing (aluminum, vinyl, cementitious coatings)
• Ventilation provisions prevent moisture accumulation
• Fire-rated assemblies for proximity to buildings

The low thermal mass of foam boards reduces heat capacity in enclosures, requiring careful sizing of supplemental heating systems for freeze protection.

Roof and Wall Penetrations

Duct and pipe penetrations through roofs and exterior walls require insulated curbs and sleeves maintaining building envelope thermal performance.

Installation requirements:

• Continuous insulation across penetration assemblies
• Air sealing eliminates infiltration pathways
• Flashing integration maintains water barrier integrity
• Fire-stopping materials achieve required fire-resistance ratings

Polyiso boards with foil facings provide continuous vapor retarders at penetrations, reducing interstitial condensation risk in building cavities.

Installation and Workability

Cutting and Fabrication

Foam boards accept standard woodworking tools for field cutting and fitting.

Recommended cutting methods:

• EPS: Hot wire, fine-tooth saw, utility knife
• XPS: Fine-tooth saw, hot knife, scoring and snapping
• Polyiso: Circular saw, utility knife, hot knife

Hot-wire and hot-knife cutting produces smooth edges with minimal dust generation. Mechanical sawing creates foam dust requiring cleanup and respiratory protection.

Adhesive Systems

Mechanical attachment and adhesive bonding secure foam boards to substrates.

Compatible adhesives:

• Low-VOC construction adhesives (polyurethane-based)
• Solvent-free contact cements
• Water-based mastics
• Two-component urethane foams

Testing verifies adhesive compatibility with specific foam formulations, particularly for polystyrene products sensitive to solvent attack.

Edge Treatment and Joint Sealing

Proper edge treatment and joint sealing eliminate thermal bridges and air leakage pathways.

Sealing methods:

• Aluminum foil tape (minimum 2-inch overlap)
• Foil-backed butyl tape
• Single-component polyurethane sealants
• Spray-applied foam sealants (compatible formulations)

Joints represent 10-20% of total surface area in typical installations. Inadequate joint sealing reduces effective R-value by 15-25% through thermal bridging and air infiltration.

Quality Control and Standards

Relevant standards governing foam board insulation properties and testing:

• ASTM C578: Standard Specification for Rigid, Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation
• ASTM C1289: Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board
• ASTM C518: Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus
• ASTM E84: Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials
• ASTM D1621: Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics
• ASTM D2126: Standard Test Method for Response of Rigid Cellular Plastics to Thermal and Humid Aging
• ASTM C1289: Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board

Third-party certification programs verify compliance with published standards and performance specifications for quality assurance.

Sections