Perm Ratings
Perm ratings quantify the rate at which water vapor transmits through materials under specified conditions. The permeance value serves as the fundamental metric for selecting vapor retarders and designing moisture-safe building envelope assemblies.
Permeance Definition and Units
Permeance measures the time rate of water vapor transmission through unit area of flat material induced by unit vapor pressure difference between two surfaces.
U.S. (I-P) Units:
- Perm (grain/h·ft²·in.Hg)
- 1 perm = 1 grain/(h·ft²·in.Hg)
- Standard test conditions: 73.4°F (23°C), 50% RH
SI (Metric) Units:
- ng/(Pa·s·m²)
- 1 perm = 57.4 ng/(Pa·s·m²)
- Conversion factor: 57.4 × (I-P perms) = SI perms
Permeability vs. Permeance:
- Permeability: intrinsic material property independent of thickness
- Permeance: specific to tested thickness
- Relationship: Permeance = Permeability / Thickness
ASTM Classification System
ASTM E1745 establishes the standard classification for vapor retarders based on permeance values.
Class Definitions
| Class | Description | Perm Range | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class I | Vapor impermeable | 0.1 perm or less | Cold climate vapor barriers, below-grade waterproofing |
| Class II | Vapor semi-impermeable | 0.1 to 1.0 perm | Mixed climate vapor retarders, moderate moisture control |
| Class III | Vapor semi-permeable | 1.0 to 10 perm | Mixed and hot-humid climates, “smart” retarders |
| Permeable | Vapor permeable | Greater than 10 perm | Drainage planes, air barriers, exterior sheathing |
Classification Significance
Class I Materials:
- Provide maximum resistance to vapor diffusion
- Risk of moisture accumulation if installed on wrong side of assembly
- Limit drying potential in both directions
- Examples: polyethylene film, aluminum foil, sheet metal
Class II Materials:
- Moderate vapor diffusion resistance
- Allow some drying capacity
- Suitable for moderate climate zones
- Examples: kraft-faced insulation, asphalt-coated paper
Class III Materials:
- Significant vapor transmission allowed
- Good drying potential
- Appropriate for assemblies requiring bidirectional drying
- Examples: latex paint, unfaced insulation
Test Methods and Standards
ASTM E96 Water Method
The standard test method for water vapor transmission of materials.
Test Procedure:
- Material specimen sealed over dish containing water or desiccant
- Assembly placed in controlled environment
- Weight change measured over time
- Permeance calculated from transmission rate
Test Conditions:
- Procedure A (Desiccant Method): 90°F, 0% to 50% RH gradient
- Procedure B (Water Method): 73.4°F, 50% to 100% RH gradient
- Procedure C (Inverted Cup): Various temperature/humidity conditions
Calculation:
Permeance = (W × t) / (A × Δp)
Where:
- W = weight change (grains)
- t = time (hours)
- A = test area (ft²)
- Δp = vapor pressure difference (in.Hg)
ASTM E96 Dry Cup Method
Used for very low permeance materials.
Advantages:
- Better resolution for low-perm materials
- Reduced test duration for impermeable specimens
- More accurate for Class I materials
Limitations:
- Different results than wet cup method
- Not representative of all field conditions
- Temperature-dependent results
Material Perm Ratings
Class I Materials (≤0.1 Perm)
| Material | Thickness | Permeance (perm) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyethylene sheet | 6 mil | 0.06 | Standard vapor barrier |
| Aluminum foil | 1 mil | 0.00 | Essentially zero transmission |
| Rubber membrane | 45 mil | 0.05 | EPDM roofing |
| Sheet metal | 28 gauge | 0.00 | Steel/aluminum panels |
| Foil-faced polyiso | 1 inch | 0.05 | Insulation with facer |
| Bituminous coating | Applied | 0.02-0.10 | Depending on thickness |
| SBS-modified bitumen | 60 mil | 0.05 | Below-grade waterproofing |
Class II Materials (0.1-1.0 Perm)
| Material | Thickness | Permeance (perm) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kraft-faced fiberglass | Applied | 0.2-0.5 | Standard insulation facing |
| Asphalt-coated paper | 15 lb | 0.4 | Traditional building paper |
| OSB sheathing | 7/16 inch | 0.7 | Oriented strand board |
| Plywood | 1/2 inch | 0.5-0.7 | Douglas fir |
| Extruded polystyrene | 1 inch | 0.8-1.2 | XPS foam board |
| Polyethylene film | 0.5 mil | 0.8 | Lightweight retarder |
Class III Materials (1.0-10 Perm)
| Material | Thickness | Permeance (perm) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latex paint | 2 coats | 2-5 | Depends on formulation |
| “Smart” vapor retarders | Applied | 1-8 | Variable permeance |
| Housewrap (perforated) | Applied | 5-10 | Air/water barrier |
| Expanded polystyrene | 1 inch | 2-5 | EPS foam board |
| Fiberboard sheathing | 1/2 inch | 3 | Impregnated board |
| Gypsum board (unpainted) | 1/2 inch | 3-5 | Standard drywall |
Permeable Materials (>10 Perm)
| Material | Thickness | Permeance (perm) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gypsum board (painted 1 coat) | 1/2 inch | 15-20 | Single latex coat |
| Housewrap (spunbonded) | Applied | 50-80 | High-perm drainage plane |
| Mineral wool insulation | 3.5 inch | >100 | Unfaced batt |
| Fiberglass insulation | 3.5 inch | >100 | Unfaced batt |
| Cellulose insulation | Loose-fill | >100 | Blown-in |
| Cement board | 1/2 inch | 20-40 | Exterior sheathing |
| Building paper (asphalt-felt) | 30 lb | 12-20 | Heavier weight |
Variable Permeance Materials
Advanced vapor retarders with humidity-dependent permeability provide adaptive moisture control.
Operating Principle
Dry Conditions (Winter):
- Material exhibits low permeance (Class II)
- Reduces outward vapor drive
- Protects insulation from condensation
Humid Conditions (Summer):
- Material exhibits higher permeance (Class III)
- Allows inward drying
- Prevents moisture accumulation
Permeance Response Curve
Typical “smart” vapor retarder characteristics:
| Relative Humidity | Permeance (perm) | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| 0-25% | 0.8-1.0 | Class II |
| 25-50% | 1.5-3.0 | Class III |
| 50-75% | 4.0-8.0 | Class III |
| 75-100% | 10-20 | Permeable |
Common Products
- Nylon-based membranes
- Modified kraft facings
- Polymer-based “smart” sheets
- Coating systems
Factors Affecting Permeance
Temperature Dependence
Water vapor permeability increases exponentially with temperature.
Arrhenius Relationship:
μ(T) = μ₀ × exp[-E/(R×T)]
Where:
- μ(T) = permeability at temperature T
- μ₀ = reference permeability
- E = activation energy
- R = gas constant
- T = absolute temperature (K)
Practical Impact:
- Doubling of permeance possible over 20-40°F range
- Cold-side materials exhibit lower transmission
- Summer conditions increase vapor flow rates
Humidity Effects
Many materials exhibit non-linear permeance response to relative humidity.
Hygroscopic Materials:
- Wood products: permeance increases at high RH
- Gypsum board: moisture content affects transmission
- Paper facings: significant RH dependence
Non-Hygroscopic Materials:
- Plastics: minimal RH effect
- Metals: no RH dependence
- Foams: slight variation with humidity
Aging and Degradation
Long-term permeance stability varies by material type.
Stable Materials:
- Polyethylene films
- Metal foils
- Glass
- Extruded polystyrene
Degrading Materials:
- Asphalt coatings (oxidation)
- Some paints (weathering)
- Kraft facings (moisture cycling)
- Adhesives (UV exposure)
Design Considerations
Climate Zone Application
Cold Climates (Zones 6-8):
- Class I or II vapor retarder on interior (warm side)
- Permeable materials on exterior (cold side)
- Prevents winter condensation in insulation
Mixed Climates (Zones 4-5):
- Class II or III vapor retarder recommended
- Consider variable permeance materials
- Balance winter protection with summer drying
Hot-Humid Climates (Zones 1-3):
- No interior vapor retarder recommended
- Class III or permeable interior finish
- Vapor control on exterior if required
Assembly Perm Analysis
The “5:1 rule” for assembly design:
Winter-Dominated Climate:
- Exterior materials should have ≥5× the permeance of interior
- Ratio = Perm(exterior) / Perm(interior) ≥ 5
- Ensures any diffused moisture can escape outward
Summer-Dominated Climate:
- Interior materials should have ≥5× the permeance of exterior
- Ratio = Perm(interior) / Perm(exterior) ≥ 5
- Allows inward-driven moisture to dry toward interior
Continuous Insulation Impact
Exterior continuous insulation alters vapor pressure profiles.
High R-Value Exterior Insulation:
- Raises sheathing temperature
- Reduces condensation potential
- May eliminate need for interior vapor retarder
Critical R-Value Ratio:
R(exterior) / R(cavity) > Critical Ratio
Critical ratio varies by climate (0.2 to 0.5 typical).
Code Requirements
International Building Code (IBC)
IBC Section 1404 addresses vapor retarders.
Requirements:
- Class I or II vapor retarder required in Climate Zones 5 and higher
- Exceptions for specific assemblies
- Compliance with IECC Chapter 4
Exceptions:
- Basement walls
- Below-grade portions of walls
- Construction where moisture/weathering deterioration is prevented
- Walls of groups R-2, R-3, R-4 in Climate Zones 1, 2, 3
International Residential Code (IRC)
IRC Section R702.7 specifies vapor retarder installation.
Class I or II Required:
- Climate Zones 5, 6, 7, 8, Marine 4
- Installed on interior side of frame wall
Class III Permitted:
- With specific exterior insulation ratios
- With vented cladding systems
- In Climate Zones 1-4 except Marine 4
ASHRAE Standards
ASHRAE 90.1 Section 5.5.15:
- Vapor retarder requirement based on climate
- Exception for demonstrated moisture-safe assembly
ASHRAE 160:
- Moisture analysis methodology
- Performance-based compliance option
- Hygrothermal modeling requirements
Testing and Verification
Quality Control Testing
Manufacturing QC:
- ASTM E96 at regular intervals
- Batch testing for consistency
- Specification compliance verification
Field Verification:
- Visual inspection for damage
- Continuity testing
- Seam integrity confirmation
Installation Quality
Critical Details:
- Continuous vapor retarder plane
- Sealed penetrations (electrical boxes, pipes)
- Sealed joints and seams
- Overlap requirements (6 inches minimum)
Common Defects:
- Tears or punctures
- Unsealed penetrations
- Gaps at transitions
- Inadequate overlap
Measurement Uncertainty
Test Variability
ASTM E96 typical coefficient of variation:
| Permeance Range | COV (%) | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| <0.1 perm | 15-25% | High precision required |
| 0.1-1.0 perm | 10-15% | Moderate variability |
| 1.0-10 perm | 10-20% | Specification margins needed |
| >10 perm | 15-30% | Less critical for permeable materials |
Specification Tolerances
Recommended specification approach:
- Class I: specify maximum perm (e.g., “0.1 perm maximum”)
- Class II: specify range (e.g., “0.1 to 1.0 perm”)
- Class III: specify minimum perm (e.g., “1.0 perm minimum”)
- Include test method reference (ASTM E96, Method A or B)
Multilayer Assemblies
Series Resistance Calculation
For layered assemblies, total vapor resistance equals sum of individual resistances.
Resistance (Reperm):
Reperm = 1 / Permeance
Total Assembly Resistance:
Reperm,total = Reperm,1 + Reperm,2 + … + Reperm,n
Assembly Permeance:
Perm,assembly = 1 / Reperm,total
Example Calculation
Wall assembly:
- Interior paint: 5 perm
- Gypsum board: 4 perm
- Kraft-faced insulation: 0.4 perm
- OSB sheathing: 0.7 perm
- Housewrap: 50 perm
Reperm values:
- Paint: 1/5 = 0.20
- Gypsum: 1/4 = 0.25
- Kraft: 1/0.4 = 2.50
- OSB: 1/0.7 = 1.43
- Housewrap: 1/50 = 0.02
Total: 4.40
Assembly permeance: 1/4.40 = 0.23 perm (Class II)
Controlling Layer: Kraft facing dominates resistance.
Advanced Considerations
Air Leakage vs. Vapor Diffusion
Vapor transport via air leakage typically exceeds diffusion by 10:1 to 100:1 ratio.
Relative Importance:
- Air barrier continuity (primary concern)
- Vapor retarder placement (secondary concern)
- Material perm rating (tertiary concern)
Combined Strategy:
- Seal air leakage paths first
- Design vapor control second
- Select appropriate perm ratings third
Moisture Storage Capacity
Materials with high moisture storage can buffer vapor transmission.
Hygric Buffer:
- Wood products: 50-150 kg/m³ moisture capacity
- Gypsum: 20-40 kg/m³
- Concrete: 80-120 kg/m³
This storage delays moisture accumulation and can prevent condensation.
Capillary vs. Diffusion Transport
At high moisture contents, capillary liquid transport exceeds vapor diffusion.
Transition Point:
- Occurs at 95-98% RH
- Capillary flow 100-1000× faster than diffusion
- Important for rain penetration, not typical diffusion scenarios
References and Resources
ASTM Standards:
- ASTM E96: Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission
- ASTM E1745: Standard Specification for Plastic Water Vapor Retarders
- ASTM E2178: Standard Test Method for Air Permeance of Building Materials
Building Codes:
- International Building Code (IBC)
- International Residential Code (IRC)
- International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
ASHRAE Resources:
- ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals, Chapter 26: Heat, Air, and Moisture Control
- ASHRAE Standard 160: Criteria for Moisture-Control Design Analysis
- ASHRAE Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings
Industry Guidelines:
- Building Science Corporation: Moisture Control Strategies
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Moisture Control Guidance
- Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC): Vapor Barriers