Cogeneration and Combined Heat and Power Systems

Combined heat and power systems represent the simultaneous production of electrical or mechanical energy and useful thermal energy from a single fuel source. This integrated approach achieves substantially higher overall efficiency than separate generation of electricity and heat, with typical total efficiencies reaching 70-90% compared to 45-55% for conventional separate systems. The thermodynamic advantage stems from utilizing thermal energy that would otherwise be rejected to the environment in power-only generation.

Thermodynamic Fundamentals

The fundamental advantage of cogeneration derives from capturing and utilizing thermal energy associated with power generation. Conventional central power plants convert approximately 33-40% of fuel energy to electricity, rejecting 60-67% as waste heat. Cogeneration systems recover a substantial portion of this thermal energy for heating, cooling, or process applications, dramatically improving fuel utilization.

First law efficiency evaluates energy conversion based on energy conservation:

$$\eta_I = \frac{W_{elec} + Q_{useful}}{Q_{fuel}}$$

Where $W_{elec}$ represents electrical work output, $Q_{useful}$ represents recovered thermal energy, and $Q_{fuel}$ represents total fuel energy input. Typical CHP systems achieve first law efficiencies of 70-85%, significantly exceeding separate generation.

Second law efficiency accounts for energy quality differences using exergy analysis:

$$\eta_{II} = \frac{W_{elec} + Q_{useful}\left(1 - \frac{T_0}{T_h}\right)}{Q_{fuel}\left(1 - \frac{T_0}{T_{flame}}\right)}$$

Where $T_0$ represents ambient temperature, $T_h$ represents heat delivery temperature, and $T_{flame}$ represents combustion temperature. This formulation recognizes that high-grade electrical energy has greater thermodynamic value than low-grade thermal energy.

The power-to-heat ratio characterizes the relative outputs:

$$\text{PHR} = \frac{W_{elec}}{Q_{useful}}$$

Different prime mover technologies exhibit characteristic power-to-heat ratios ranging from 0.5 for steam turbines to 1.5 for gas turbines. Matching the PHR to facility electrical and thermal load profiles determines application suitability.

Prime Mover Technologies

Multiple prime mover technologies convert fuel energy to mechanical shaft power for electricity generation while producing recoverable thermal energy. Selection depends on capacity requirements, fuel availability, electrical efficiency priorities, thermal temperature requirements, and economic considerations.

Reciprocating internal combustion engines, both gas-fired and diesel, dominate the 100 kW to 10 MW capacity range. These engines achieve electrical efficiencies of 32-42% with thermal recovery from exhaust gas, jacket water, lubricating oil, and intercoolers. The relatively low exhaust temperatures (400-500°C) suit low-pressure steam or hot water generation.

Combustion gas turbines operate across a wide capacity range from 1 MW to over 300 MW, with electrical efficiencies of 25-42% depending on size and technology. The high-temperature exhaust (450-600°C) enables high-pressure steam generation and supports absorption cooling. Simple cycle gas turbines exhibit lower electrical efficiency but higher thermal availability than reciprocating engines.

Steam turbines extract work from high-pressure steam, operating in back-pressure, extraction, or condensing modes. Back-pressure turbines exhaust at elevated pressure for process use, while extraction turbines draw steam at intermediate pressures. Condensing turbines maximize electrical output at the expense of thermal recovery. Steam turbines suit applications with existing steam generation or solid fuel combustion.

Microturbines represent compact gas turbines in the 30-300 kW range, featuring single-stage radial compressors and turbines. High-speed permanent magnet generators and power electronics eliminate gearboxes. Electrical efficiency reaches 25-30% with exhaust temperatures of 250-300°C after recuperation.

Fuel cells electrochemically convert fuel to electricity with minimal combustion. Phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFC), molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFC), and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) operate at progressively higher temperatures (200°C, 650°C, 1000°C), offering electrical efficiencies of 40-60%. The high-quality thermal output and low emissions make fuel cells attractive despite higher capital costs.

Heat Recovery Equipment

Effective heat recovery equipment captures thermal energy from prime mover waste streams and delivers it at useful temperatures and pressures. Multiple heat sources exist in most prime movers, each requiring appropriate heat recovery technology.

Exhaust heat recovery captures the largest thermal stream in most prime movers. Heat recovery steam generators (HRSG) extract energy from gas turbine or engine exhaust to generate steam at pressures from 15 psig to 600 psig. Economizers preheat boiler feedwater using exhaust energy. Exhaust temperatures must remain above acid dew point (typically 250-300°F) to prevent corrosion.

Hot water heat recovery from reciprocating engine jacket cooling and oil cooling circuits provides lower-temperature thermal energy (180-230°F) suitable for space heating, domestic hot water, or low-temperature processes. Heat exchangers transfer thermal energy from engine coolant to facility hot water systems.

Absorption chiller integration converts recovered thermal energy to cooling capacity, expanding CHP applications to cooling-dominated facilities. Single-effect absorption chillers operate from low-pressure steam or 230°F hot water with COPs near 0.7. Double-effect chillers require 300°F hot water or medium-pressure steam, achieving COPs of 1.2-1.4.

System Integration and Operation

CHP systems integrate with facility electrical and thermal systems through multiple configurations. Grid-parallel operation maintains connection to the electrical utility, allowing power import when CHP output is insufficient and export when generation exceeds load. This configuration provides maximum reliability and operational flexibility.

Island operation disconnects from the utility grid, requiring the CHP system to exactly match facility electrical load through fast-responding controls. Load-following capability becomes essential, potentially compromising thermal utilization.

Thermal integration connects heat recovery equipment to facility heating, cooling, and process loads through hot water systems, steam distribution, or direct exhaust utilization. Thermal energy storage buffers mismatches between CHP thermal production and facility thermal demand.

The electrical-to-thermal load duration curves characterize facility energy consumption patterns. CHP systems sized for baseload thermal demand operate continuously at high capacity factors (70-90%), maximizing economic returns. Larger systems meeting peak demands operate at lower capacity factors with reduced economics.

Economic Evaluation

CHP economic viability depends on the difference between avoided purchased energy costs and CHP operating costs plus capital recovery. Facilities with high electricity costs, substantial thermal loads, and long operating hours provide the most favorable economics.

Simple payback period calculates the time required to recover initial investment:

$$\text{Payback} = \frac{\text{Installed Cost}}{\text{Annual Energy Savings} - \text{Annual O&M Costs}}$$

Payback periods of 3-7 years typically indicate favorable projects, though specific thresholds vary by organization and incentive availability.

Net present value accounts for the time value of money:

$$\text{NPV} = \sum_{t=1}^n \frac{CF_t}{(1+r)^t} - C_0$$

Where $CF_t$ represents net cash flow in year $t$, $r$ represents discount rate, $n$ represents project lifetime, and $C_0$ represents initial capital cost. Positive NPV indicates economic attractiveness.

Energy savings derive from displacing purchased electricity and thermal fuel:

$$\text{Savings} = E_{elec} \cdot c_{elec} + Q_{thermal} \cdot c_{fuel,boiler}/\eta_{boiler} - Q_{fuel,CHP} \cdot c_{fuel,CHP}$$

Operating costs include fuel, maintenance, and potentially standby charges or demand charges from the electric utility.

Environmental Performance

CHP systems reduce overall emissions compared to separate generation by improving fuel utilization efficiency. The emissions reduction depends on the displaced electricity generation mix and thermal generation efficiency.

Carbon dioxide emissions scale directly with fuel consumption:

$$\text{CO}2 = Q{fuel} \cdot EF_{CO_2}$$

Where $EF_{CO_2}$ represents the fuel-specific emission factor (117 lb CO₂/MMBtu for natural gas, 161 lb CO₂/MMBtu for diesel). The emissions reduction equals the difference between separate generation and CHP:

$$\Delta \text{CO}2 = \left(\frac{W{elec}}{\eta_{grid}} + \frac{Q_{thermal}}{\eta_{boiler}}\right) EF_{grid+boiler} - \frac{W_{elec} + Q_{thermal}}{\eta_{CHP}} EF_{CHP}$$

Nitrogen oxide emissions depend on combustion temperature, residence time, and control technologies. Low-NOx burners, selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) reduce NOx formation and destruction. Emissions limits vary by jurisdiction and installation size.

Carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbon emissions result from incomplete combustion. Proper air-fuel ratio control, adequate combustion temperature, and sufficient residence time minimize these emissions. Catalytic oxidation provides additional control for stringent requirements.

Particulate matter emissions are minimal for natural gas-fired systems but significant for diesel and biomass fuels. Diesel particulate filters and baghouse dust collectors control particulate emissions when required.

Sections