HVAC Systems Encyclopedia

A comprehensive encyclopedia of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems

Chiller Systems for Central Cooling Plants

Chillers represent the workhorse of large-scale air conditioning systems, converting electrical or thermal energy into cooling capacity through thermodynamic refrigeration cycles. These machines provide chilled water (typically 42-48°F) to air handling units, fan coil units, and process equipment throughout commercial, institutional, and industrial facilities.

Fundamental Operating Principles

Vapor Compression Chillers

Vapor compression chillers operate on the reversed Carnot cycle, utilizing phase change of refrigerant to absorb heat at low temperature and reject it at elevated temperature. The thermodynamic relationship governing chiller performance is expressed through the coefficient of performance (COP):

$$\text{COP} = \frac{Q_{\text{evap}}}{W_{\text{comp}}} = \frac{h_1 - h_4}{h_2 - h_1}$$

where $h_1$, $h_2$, and $h_4$ represent refrigerant enthalpies at evaporator outlet, compressor discharge, and expansion valve inlet respectively.

The theoretical maximum efficiency follows Carnot limitations:

$$\text{COP}{\text{Carnot}} = \frac{T{\text{evap}}}{T_{\text{cond}} - T_{\text{evap}}}$$

with temperatures in absolute scale (Rankine or Kelvin). Real chillers achieve 40-60% of Carnot efficiency due to irreversibilities in compression, heat transfer, and expansion processes.

graph LR
    A[Evaporator<br/>Low P, Low T] -->|Refrigerant Vapor| B[Compressor<br/>Work Input]
    B -->|High P, High T| C[Condenser<br/>Heat Rejection]
    C -->|High P Liquid| D[Expansion Valve<br/>Throttling]
    D -->|Low P Liquid| A

    E[Chilled Water<br/>54°F] --> A
    A --> F[Chilled Water<br/>44°F]

    G[Condenser Water<br/>85°F] --> C
    C --> H[Condenser Water<br/>95°F]

Absorption Chillers

Absorption chillers replace mechanical compression with thermal energy-driven absorption/desorption cycles. The solution circuit uses lithium bromide-water or ammonia-water pairs, where the absorbent exhibits strong affinity for refrigerant vapor at low temperatures.

The heat balance for single-effect absorption systems:

$$\text{COP}{\text{abs}} = \frac{Q{\text{evap}}}{Q_{\text{gen}} + W_{\text{pump}}} \approx 0.65 - 0.75$$

Double-effect absorption chillers achieve COP values of 1.0-1.2 by cascading generator stages, though requiring higher input temperatures (300-380°F vs 230-250°F for single-effect).

Chiller Configuration Comparison

Water-Cooled vs Air-Cooled Systems

ParameterWater-CooledAir-Cooled
Typical Efficiency0.50-0.65 kW/ton0.85-1.15 kW/ton
Condenser Temperature85-105°F100-130°F
FootprintCompactLarger
Water Consumption2-3 gpm/100 tonsNone
MaintenanceCooling tower requiredCoil cleaning
Initial CostHigher (tower + piping)Lower
Capacity TurndownExcellent (10-100%)Good (25-100%)
Noise LevelLowerHigher

The efficiency advantage of water-cooled systems derives directly from reduced lift requirements. Using the log-mean temperature difference (LMTD) approach, the required heat transfer area scales inversely with approach temperature:

$$Q = UA \cdot \text{LMTD} = UA \cdot \frac{\Delta T_1 - \Delta T_2}{\ln(\Delta T_1/\Delta T_2)}$$

Lower condensing temperatures reduce compression ratios exponentially per the Clausius-Clapeyron relationship, directly improving efficiency.

Compressor Technologies

Compressor TypeCapacity RangeEfficiencyPart-Load PerformanceTypical Applications
Scroll2-60 tonsGoodFair (stepped)Small commercial
Screw50-750 tonsVery GoodExcellentMedium commercial
Centrifugal100-10,000+ tonsExcellentGood (surge limits)Large central plants
Magnetic Bearing75-2,000 tonsSuperiorExcellent (0.1% turndown)High-performance plants

Centrifugal compressors dominate large installations due to oil-free operation and efficiency. The Euler turbomachinery equation governs their performance:

$$\Delta h = U_2 C_{u2} - U_1 C_{u1}$$

where $U$ represents impeller tip speed and $C_u$ denotes tangential velocity components. Variable speed drives optimize performance across load ranges by modulating impeller speed rather than inlet vane position.

Capacity Ranges and Selection Criteria

Sizing Methodology

Chiller capacity must satisfy peak cooling load with appropriate safety factor while maintaining acceptable part-load efficiency. The fundamental heat balance:

$$Q_{\text{chiller}} = \dot{m} c_p \Delta T = \frac{\text{gpm} \times 500 \times \Delta T}{12,000}$$ (tons)

Standard design parameters:

  • Chilled water flow rate: 2.4 gpm/ton (10°F ΔT) or 3.0 gpm/ton (8°F ΔT)
  • Condenser water flow rate: 3.0 gpm/ton (10°F ΔT)
  • Evaporator approach: 2-4°F
  • Condenser approach: 2-5°F

Multiple Chiller Configurations

Central plants typically employ 2-4 chillers for redundancy and part-load optimization. The energy consumption profile demonstrates why staging matters:

graph TD
    A[Total Plant Load] --> B{Load Distribution Strategy}
    B --> C[Equal Loading<br/>2 x 50%]
    B --> D[Sequenced Loading<br/>1 x 100% + 1 x 0%]

    C --> E[kW/ton = 0.65<br/>Both at 50% load]
    D --> F[kW/ton = 0.58<br/>One at 100% load]

    E --> G[Total: 0.65 kW/ton]
    F --> H[Total: 0.58 kW/ton<br/>12% Savings]

ASHRAE 90.1 mandates sequencing controls that minimize total plant power (chillers + pumps + towers) rather than individual chiller efficiency.

Performance Metrics and Standards

Efficiency Ratings

IPLV (Integrated Part Load Value) per AHRI Standard 550/590 provides realistic efficiency assessment:

$$\text{IPLV} = 0.01A + 0.42B + 0.45C + 0.12D$$

where A, B, C, D represent efficiency (kW/ton) at 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% load respectively. Modern water-cooled centrifugal chillers achieve IPLV values of 0.40-0.50 kW/ton.

Condenser Water Temperature Impact

Chiller efficiency varies dramatically with condensing temperature. Empirical relationships show:

$$\frac{\text{kW/ton}2}{\text{kW/ton}1} \approx \left(\frac{T{\text{cond,2}}}{T{\text{cond,1}}\right)^{1.5}$$

Reducing condenser water from 85°F to 75°F typically improves efficiency by 8-12%, demonstrating the value of low approach cooling towers and free cooling integration.

Central Plant Applications

Chilled water systems offer advantages over distributed DX equipment in facilities exceeding 50,000 ft² or requiring cooling capacities above 150 tons:

  • Energy efficiency: Central plant efficiencies of 0.50-0.60 kW/ton vs 0.85-1.1 kW/ton for rooftop units
  • Equipment life: 20-30 years vs 15-20 years for distributed systems
  • Maintenance centralization: Single location vs distributed rooftop access
  • Thermal storage compatibility: Ice or chilled water storage for demand management
  • Free cooling potential: Waterside economizers when ambient conditions permit

District cooling systems extend the central plant concept to multiple buildings, leveraging diversity factors and economies of scale. Distribution losses (typically 2-5% per 1000 ft of piping) must be evaluated against equipment efficiency gains.

References

AHRI Standard 550/590: Performance Rating of Water-Chilling and Heat Pump Water-Heating Packages Using the Vapor Compression Cycle

ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Systems and Equipment, Chapter 43: Liquid Chilers

ASHRAE Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings

Sections

Vapor Compression Chillers: Design & Performance

Comprehensive analysis of vapor compression chiller thermodynamics, compressor types, heat exchanger design, and efficiency metrics with ASHRAE standards and kW/ton calculations.

Absorption Chillers: Heat-Driven Cooling Technology

Technical analysis of absorption chiller thermodynamics, lithium bromide-water cycles, COP performance, and waste heat recovery applications for HVAC systems.

Chiller Performance

Analysis of chiller efficiency at full-load and part-load conditions, IPLV calculations, lift temperature effects, approach temperatures, and factors affecting performance degradation.